Thursday, February 26, 2009

Venture Capital 101

An Extremely Valuable Entrepreneurial Resource

Realizing early stage entrepreneurs often have many misconceptions about venture capital, BillSnow put together this very handy introductory look at the world of venture capital. In seventy jam packed and easy to read pages, Venture Capital 101 shatters myths, and believe it or not, uses Keith Richard's guitar tuning as a paradigm to:
• Dispel the many myths and misconceptions about venture capital.
• Better position the entrepreneur for successful venture capital raises by 1) identifying the characteristics venture capitalists find attractive and 2) providing a framework for when and how to raise venture capital.
• Demonstrate venture capital is not a stamp of approval. The entrepreneur can build a successful company without raising venture capital. In other words, there is no shame in aspiring to build a company that is not “venture worthy.”
• Teach the entrepreneur when to "cut bait." Dump bad ideas and save time and money trying to raise venture capital for deals that are not venture worthy.

READ nine pages - by Bill Snow - http://www.billsnow.com/Venture%20Capital%20101_2004_10_25_9_Pages.pdf

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

FINANCING YOUR INDIE FILM

CATCH 22: Without NO contract and NO offer in place, it's highly unlikely any "A" list actor would ever be attached to any project. If an "A" list actor was attached to a project, the project’s producer would likely already have all his funding.

The majority of new media films are still funded through friends, relatives or a wealthy patron familiar with the director, actor or screenwriter’s work and potential. The source of the venture capital is usually willing to lose whatever money he advances and has enough in reserve so that he will not be affected by its loss. He knows that well over 95% of all independent new media digital films made lose money and cannot find distribution.

When writing a business plan for your film its wise to mention films like El Mariachi, Napoleon Dynamite, Saw, The Blair Witch Project, and My Big Fat Greek Wedding as examples of independent films that hit the box office jackpot.

READ MORE - http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/film-studies-the-az-of-how-to-lose-money-in-hollywood-587570.html

©2009, Stanley N. Lozowski. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

WHO IS FUNDING YOUR FILM?

Be very careful when asked to advance money or escrow money to any company or executive producer that promises to obtain funding or venture capital to back your film project. This is NOT how films are financed. There are many scams out there and it is unfortunate that people have been taken advantage of in all financial avenues.

Since the market has soured, several large real estate lenders are attempting to enter film finance. While they do not ask advance fees, YES they have the money but at present, the only service they offer is to give a filmmaker a lower interest rate on their Gap, bridge and on the soft money.

In order to get their money at lower interest rates however, the filmmaker must put together his entire film and after the project is ready to go these new lenders will want up to half the project for an interest rate 6% to 7% less than traditional rates, plus fees. They obviously want to make the same money they made "flipping" houses.

After you have completed all the work, they provide a service (which depending on your circumstances might be unnecessary) and it is difficult to determine the "real" cost of their money until you are ready to accept their money. It's like going to a "closing" and you just might waste months and months in negotiations, discussions, gathering and presenting information just to find out the deal is not what you thought it would be. Exercise extreme due diligence in all such cases and do not put a lot of your valuable time into any such deals.

After many years in the film production business and having exercised due diligence on many companies who claimed to provide funding for up front fees, to date no one seems to have found any that are legit with a strong track record and yet they ask the filmmakers to have a strong track record and in many acses to "escrow 10, 20 and up to 50 percent of the money to make their film so they might borrow against it. A number of filmmakers wrote to tell me that ALL the filmmakers they know with strong track records already have financing lined up for their next films. And so, these "financiers" are left to work with film projects that have "lesser track records" which is exactly what they have.

To cash in on the growing number of filmmakers who seek funds, many "film funding" companies were and still are being founded by individuals with a history of legal troubles. Before you ever consider working with a financier, you should ask to speak with a film producer that has raised funds through this financier for a theatrically released film. And be careful working with agents, based on experience, some reputable "film financing agents" may unwittingly be promoting third parties that could be less than reputable.

There are always certain costs in doing any type of business, and chief among those are the costs of performing due diligence. These expenses should be recoupable at the closing table, not as an advance payment.

Any film financiers who are firm on their position of having prospective clients fund their cost of doing business in advance, are suspect and probably won't have much success attracting intelligent clients.

©2008, Stanley Lozowski. All Rights Reserved.

Labels: , , ,