Friday, February 29, 2008

Learn HOW TO "MAKE IT RAIN" with Adobe After Effects FOR $25.00

Dry-for-Wet with Trapcode Particular

Mark Christiansen will show you how to create a rainstorm in this 45-minute tutorial that includes techniques for color correction, sky replacement and various uses of particles to create rain.

Mark is the author of After Effects Studio Techniques on intermediate and advanced techniques for creating realistic visual effects with Adobe After Effects. He shows how to use the Trapcode Particular plug–in to take a sunny exterior shot and create a downpour from out of the window of a moving car.

The preview is FREE and the full tutorial is $25.00. This tutorial comes in a Quicktime format that can be downloaded for a one-time charge. The tutorial is delivered in a compressed file format called an archive (.zip). These archive files are industry standards for keeping file size and download time to a minimum. Once the file has downloaded, your browser will "unstuff" the file revealing a folder with the tutorial movie and all related project elements inside.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE TUTORIAL PREVIEW>>>

http://www.studiodaily.com/store
STUDIO DAILY © 2008 Access Intelligence LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Financing & Distributing Your Indie Films

The State of Indie Film & Tips for Geting a Deal Done

Shot at the the 41st Annual International Quorum of Motion Pictures Producers, indie-film dealmaker extraodinaire John Sloss, a founding member of Cinetic Media, explains the Ins & Outs of independent film financing, marketing and distribution. In this exclusive video Johnalso explains the role the Internet can play in marketing today's films as well as distributing the films of tomorrow. - Matt Armstrong

CLICK HERE to Watch The Video
http://studiodaily.com/main/work/8977.html

STUDIO DAILY © 2008 Access Intelligence LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Entering Film Festivals WITHOUT-A-BOX

Has anyone used WithOutABox for film festival submissions? Is it better or easier than applying directly to each film festival?
HYPERLINK http://www.withoutabox.com/

************************************************************************

I have and actually found it to be quite useful, it made it so much easier to submit without all the hassle of copying and mailing. - Nicole Bukowski - zoedpe@yahoo

************************************************************************

Withoutabox is a great service. It makes the whole submission process much more efficient. I submit almost everything through the site and highly recommend using it. Most film festivals use it, and the basic service (which I've found includes everything I need) is free.

Jeff Burns - Knightsfall Productions
www.knightsfallproductions.com

************************************************************************

I've used Withoutabox for years. They've made the submission process a lot easier than it used to be.

They have a relatively new service where they'll make DVD copies of your film as needed for submissions, so you don't have to mail anything, but it wasn't worth the price last time I made a comparison. - Steve Barr - steveandcecebarr@sbcglobal

************************************************************************

I have been using Without a Box for about 2 years quite a bit. I now have 6 projects registered with them.

The good news is that once your spend the hour or whatever it is to fill out the on-line film information you basically never do it again with their festivals. I can usually submit to 5-6 festivals in less than 10 minutes. I love that.

I still mail my own DVD's, although I plan to explore the cost difference.

Most of the major festivals still do not use WOB so you still need to do their on-line submission forms.

Over all I'm very happy with them.

I met one of the owners of WOB in line for a distribution seminar at Sundance and I believe that WOB bought imdb or vice versa.

Bobby Leigh
Director "HOLODOMOR; Ukraine's Genocide of 1932-33
HYPERLINK http://www.holodomorthemovie.com/
HYPERLINK http://www.bobbyleigh.com/

***********************************************************************

I'll add my thumbs-up of withoutabox. They are great service. They have a huge searchable database of festivals. The system pre-qualifies your project for the festival or contest you are considering entering and warns you if there's a problem (if for instance your film is too long or too old for a particular category).

I haven't tried the DVD screener service. But it's so nice not to have to print and fill out forms, assemble press kits, and you save $ on postage because everything but the screener has been submitted electronically.

Finally, there is a really lively discussion board area at the site. It's packed with current and relevant info on the festival scene.

John Harden - www.johnfilms.com

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

BONDING COMPANIES for LOW BUDGET FILMS

Does anyone know of a bonding company that will do lower budget films or will bond a slate of low budget films? By low budget I'm talking approximately $200k. Would the rate be about the same as other Bonding Companies (I assume 2-3% of the budget)?

Thanks in advance. - Brian Herskowitz - screenwritingbula@yahoo

*************************************************

Brian, I've never run into a bonding company that turned down a film because of its budget (though their rates may increase).

They're much more interested in the reality of the budget and the previous production history of the key personnel. If the budget and schedule match the realities of the script, if the director, UPM and DP have brought in similar films on budget, by and large you're good to go. - Norman C. Berns - ncberns@gmail

*************************************************

My experience is that many won't deal with ULBs at all, and others will treat you as a greater credit risk (which means charging you a higher fee, 5% or higher).

On a budget that small, it seems a better calculated risk to save $10,000 on a bond and lock it away as part of a contingency fund. The extra cash you free up can pay for two more on-set personnel for the duration of the shoot, and that give you a much better shot at not having to dip into your contingency money.

The exception is if you have a "big enough" name attached. But then again, if the name is "big enough" you can just swing a negative pickup deal, which all but guarantees you can get additional investor money and/or a very cheap business line of credit that can function as a safety net.

On a ULB every nickel counts and you have to get everything cheaper than normal. Paying double for something that doesn't even end up on screen is not the best use of money.

Nicholas Gray - nicho_gray - nicho@chipchair
A Chip & A Chair Films - www.chipchair.com

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

I'm THINKING of buying a DV CAMERA...

I'm thinking of buying a DV Camera.

I'm looking at several and would like to get some opinions. Primarily the HD Sony (HV1) and the Panasonic P2. I'm even considering the older Sonys like PD150 or PD170. Any thoughts?

Thanks!
Ludy
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This is a bit of a loaded question.

What camera you should buy really depends on what you're going to shoot with it, what you think your end products are going to be and the budget you can spend on both purchase and maintenance.

Ashley
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I would agree.

Much of your decision will depend on your application. Imho, I'd avoid HDV (like the Sony HVR line). It adds a LOT of conversion and rendering time in post along with a host of visual artifacts in many common situations.

Also, HDV camera's typically use CMOS as opposed to CCD type chips to capture the video image. Without getting too technical here, CMOS scan the image from top to bottom while CCD capture the image in one shot. The result is that the image will actually bend during a pan among other quality issues. CMOS promises to be a great technology someday, but it's not quite there yet.

The Panasonic P2 cameras and the Sony PD line all have CCD. Always choose a camera with three CCDs (the same for CMOS). Also, the Panasonic flavor of HD (DVCProHD) has far fewer artifacts and can be handled natively in post in most NLEs (i.e. w/o conversion).

As for format choice, if you want to broadcast your work in the future, I highly recommend shooting in HD. The long awaited FCC mandate for HD broadcast is soon
upon us, and SD work will need another pass in post to upconvert the image to HD for the outlet that will accept it (many broadcasters have said they will not).

If you find you want to stay with standard def, I recommend a camera that shoots 16:9anamorphic (i.e. squeezed into the NTSC 4:3 space) otherwise even an upconvert will be improbable.

Finally, as far as P2 cards go, as Barry mentioned, they're not cheap. They also require a unique workflow on set where they are interchanged with a second set of cards (typically two at a time) while one set is having it's contents offloaded to a computer hard drive.

It's not unlike shooting film with short ends, needing to change magazines more often than not. This is because of the card's limited capacity, which is increasing along with their cost. So, if you go with the P2 camera, I would highly recommend looking at purchasing a "firestore," which a specially designed firewire hard drive that will greatly increase your record time, tho still not as easy as just changing tape (the main advantage of HDV).

Again, it all depends on what your doing and where it's going. If you shooting for the web, SD is fine for most applications. If you're shooting docs and mixing footage from different sources, HDV quality probably won't matter if you can afford the extra effort in post while still making your work future-proof.

If you're planning to trick a paying audience into feeling like they're watching film or you're planning to have a broadcast life for you work well into the future, best to consider the P2 option with a firestore. If anyone wants more of the technical side of this explained or links to resources, feel free to write me off list.

hth,
Ian

-

Monday, February 25, 2008

Could a DO-IT-YOURSELF Filmmaker WIN an OSCAR?

Erik Beck, the MacGyver of no-budget movies, thinks he can. Erik and the team at Indy Mogul are unbelievable, special people.

As creator of the hit web show, "Backyard FX," he teaches independent filmmakers how to make special effects, like swamp thing costumes, with common "stuff" found in your kitchen and all around the house. It's a talent and he hopes that someday one of his viewers will win an Oscar.

The movie makers at Indy Mogul create monsters and creatures out of items you can find in your home. Erik remarked, "I'm waiting for the next [Spielberg]. When I'm in the old person's home I expect to be thanked at the Oscars."

Until that day comes, he's content to teach and inspire his viewers showing them how to use the contents of their kitchen junk drawers to create everything from ninja swords and werewolves to stop-motion puppets and beating human hearts — all on a low budget of $50 or less.

Beck and his weekly "Backyard FX" show are at the heart of the guerilla filmmaking channel Indy Mogul, where a new breed of young moviemakers are using the web to learn how to create and distribute their own content. Although less than a year old, Indy Mogul is already pulling in about two million viewers a month — as well as ad dollars from big Hollywood studios pushing films like "Rambo" and "Sweeney Todd".

At 26, Beck has only worked on low-budget films. He has never worked on what he calls a "real production" even though his passion for film is real. During the sixth grade, he was building replicas of Star Wars ships from shoe boxes and asking teachers how he might pursue a career in special effects.

His family moved frequently, spurring Beck's hobbies. "I didn't have tons of friends," Bech remembers, "so I was forced to kind of entertain myself. When you don't have a lot of friends, and you have cardboard boxes lying around, you can make robots and they're your friends."

This Do-It-Yourself filmmaker teaches low-no-budget special effects on the web, while encouraging the inner-Spielberg in all of us.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE by By KEVIN SITES>>>

http://potw.news.yahoo.com/s/potw/61209/how-to-make-a-zombie-for-50-or-
Copyright © 2008 Yahoo All rights reserved.

http://potw.news.yahoo.com/s/potw/61209/a-swamp-thing-at-the-

Sunday, February 24, 2008

THE FINE ART of EDITING

If you're serious about enhancing your skills as a media pro, knowledge of the latest industry tools and trends will be a key part of your success

Wonder Boys was edited by the “grande dame” of editing, Dede Allen. Dede is best known for her groundbreaking editing of the film Bonnie and Clyde.

In that film, she used innovative jump cuts to elongate a moment and rapid cutting to create incredibly kinetic action scenes. She has already won several Academy Awards for editing, her most recent in 2000 for Wonder Boys, directed by Curtis Hanson, and starring Michael Douglas, Frances McDormand, Robert Downey Jr., and Tobey McGuire. It also happens to be the first film that Dede Allen edited using the Avid editing system.

From the start, Wonder Boys seemed an unlikely candidate for the Academy Award for Editing. It didn’t have great action scenes or an epic structure. It was a dramatic, sometimes screwball, comedy, about an English professor (Grady Tripp, played by Michael Douglas) who has lost his personal and professional bearings. He spends the film getting into a series of mishaps on his way to self-understanding.

This blog will discuss two dialog scenes, both on Track 5 of the DVD. The first is between Grady and his gifted, troubled student James (McGuire); the second is with his lover, College Dean Sara Gaskell (McDormand). In both, the pacing of dialog and editing combine to enhance the film by making the scenes come alive. A few editing techniques are also used to slightly disorient the viewer. These are not meant to overwhelm the viewer, but to provide a low-key zing appropriate for a non-action film.

This first scene is actually a string of a couple of mini-scenes. In a comic mimicking of Hitchcock’s editing style, James has just shot a dog that attacked Grady in his lover, Sara’s, house. We cut to James and Grady in a car. But audio precedes picture in this transition: we hear James says, in voice-over, “Professor Grady,” while the picture remains in the house, on the wounded Grady taking the gun from his student. It’s a nice ironic touch, this mismatch of the word “professor” with Grady’s undignified demeanor in this scene.

In the car, a fairly straightforward shot reverse-shot structure is used. But emphasis is on how the shots are cut precisely at the end of a line of dialog, without a frame to spare. Unlike many screwball comedies, the line readings themselves are slower and not hurried. The rhythm of the scene develops from the sharp edits at the end of a line in counterpoint with the more measured pace of the dialog. (The comic punch line, “I have tenure,” is the payoff of the scene – Grady’s shorthand explanation of why he, not James, should take the blame for killing the dog.) This is a 30-second gem of pacing that all good editors should study because in it is the secret to making a dialogue film come alive.

CLICK HERE to READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE and see the scene photos-by efeldman>>>

http://blogs.avid.com/blogs/training/archive/2008/02/01/303805.aspx
© Copyright 2000-2008 Avid Technology, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Saturday, February 23, 2008

BRING AN IDEA and Make Your Movie HERE

Oscar-winning Director and NYC Gallery Provide Inspiration, Sets and Gear -- You Bring the Idea

Kids often dress up as characters from their favorite stories and they then spend hours playacting in tales of their own creation. But adults rarely do that -- at least outside the bedroom.

Michel Gondry, the Academy Award-winning writer-director ("Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind") wants to change all that.

Gondry explained, "I think there is a lot of creativity that is not used, and I think people could use their own creativity to entertain themselves. That's my concept."

In a new collaboration with Deitch Projects, Gondry has transformed the gallery in New York's SoHo into a "back lot," It includes an intricate playground of sets, costumes and props where visitors are encouraged to gather a group of friends, spend about two hours shooting a movie, take home copies, and allow others to view their creations via the gallery's video store.

If this sounds familiar, it's because this is essentially a recreation of Gondry's latest film, "Be Kind Rewind." In the movie, which opens Feb. 22, Jerry (Jack Black) inadvertently erases the tapes in his friend's (Mos Def's) video store, and the pair re-create the movies to keep the business afloat. Their wild, low-tech, guerrilla approach to filmmaking is called "sweding." When the plan works better than expected, and the entire community of Passaic, N.J., unites to make a movie.

"That's the beauty of being a director," Gondry said via telephone from Berlin. "You can create the world according to what you want to happen."

Residents of Passaic eagerly participated in the filming of "Be Kind Rewind," and Gondry was inspired by their enthusiasm to continue the community filmmaking in a "more real-life way."

Gondry explained that he doesn't want any content created at the gallery to be posted online. He sees the activity as entertainment and wants to promote an environment free of of competition or critique.

Gondry encourages anyone who wants to participate in the exhibition to gather a group of friends, make an appointment (by sending an email to bekindrewind@deitch.com), and then spend about two hours making a film.

READ MORE By ALI SARGENT>>>
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Oscars2008/story?id=4311096&page=1

Copyright © 2008 ABCNews Internet Ventures

Friday, February 22, 2008

Exclusive with Writer JEFFREY PORRO

JEFFREY PORRO - Writer: "The Great Debaters"

I was almost 30 before I started learning one of life’s most important lessons: being talented is important, but sometimes who you know matters more. Learning that lesson helped my very first movie project get sold, and then (finally) produced.

My introduction to this came shortly after I finished grad school and went to Washington, DC with a newly minted international relations PhD in hand. I walked into the offices of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, expecting to be welcomed with open arms but I was politely told that they received ten resume’s a week from PhDs, so “We’ll keep you on file.” Knowing what that meant, no matter how glittering my credentials might be, I didn’t have a shot but I started to wonder how the staffers who somehow got jobs on the committee got their jobs.

15 years layer, I came to understand that in a city filled with super bright accomplished people having a good resume, good publications, and good references was not enough. You had to have connections and you had to build a network of people who not only knew your strengths but also had the clout to bring you to the attention of someone who might actually pay you.

Hit over the head with this lesson when I became a freelance editor and writer, I would do a good job on a newsletter or speech and then sit around waiting for the phone to ring. It didn’t happen. I had to take a crash course in how to market myself and how to build the connections I needed on order to find clients.

READ THE COMPLETE INTERVIEW by John Contrubis >>>
http://www.reelot.com/news/3117
Copyright © 2006-2008 BAT Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The State of INTERNET DISTRIBUTION

EDITOR'S NOTE:
I was amazed last year when I saw my first Internet feature film on my computer. I never dreamed that I would sit through the entire two hours glued to my monitor.
Yes, it would have been more comfortable to see it on my larger TV screen but that will come soon. Make no mistake, the technology is here today and even though everyone many not have or use it, it is already viable. It works!

Thanks to streaming video, at this moment in time Google leads the pack for Internet downloads of a feature film with over 70,000 downloads a day and over two million views per month. The most successfully distributed Internet film is ZEITGEIST (http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/) and it's available in twenty languages free of charge.
ZEITGEIST already has many more viewers than most independent made theatrically released feature films. While you may NOT agree with its premise or all the facts presented, it is amazingly well-researched. Stay with the film to its dramatic and surprising conclusion.
Because of all the publicity it has generated, if you cannot watch the download it will be shown somewhere near you on Z Day, March 15th. These is great debate that this film might very well be a major influence the 2008 US Presidential elections.

The second most downloaded Internet feature film is FOUR EYED MONSTERS (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8rRFFi_stY) shown via youTube (also Google). This film was shot on MiniDV using the Panasonic AG-DVX100 in Brooklyn and Manhattan, New York, Framingham, Massachusetts and Johnson, Vermont. It was edited on Apple's Final Cut Pro editing software.
It debuted on the festival circuit at the Slamdance Film Festival and I understand it has the distinction of being the first Internet feature movie to recoup its cost ($80,000.00) and show a profit.
In contrast, MANY theatrical and DVD distributors distributing independent feature films NEVER return a profit to the filmmakers.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The main issues surrounding the viability of Internet distribution (downloading) right now are:

One, figures from one study (this past November) put the estimated households that have broadband at 66 Million homes. Not bad, as this is a significant increase from the previous year. But that still means 50-55 Million homes either have dial-up or NO internet access. So forget about them downloading movies for now.

Two, of the 66 Million homes that have broadband, only a small percentage has the Apple TV or any of the other equipment to easily download and watch immediately without having to transfer anything. There are of course those who download and hook their laptop up to their TV, etc., but most people just want to download and watch from their couches and not have to screw around.

The other factor that affects some of this, is that VOD has really blossomed over the past 2-3 years, and the average Joe can just peruse the InDemand library (or whatever library is available from their cable provider) and call up one of any number of movies to watch right now, for $3.99. So the "urgency" to be able to download and watch movies is not really present. We have so many choices now as to how to get our movies.

The last major factor, is that for the average filmmaker, what site can they put their film up at, that will get massive traffic? iTunes isn't available to most, Netflix isn't available to most (for downloading right now), Amazon is, but how does one stand out there? As for all the other 10-20 sites that people talk about, yes they get traffic, but not like iTunes or Netflix. What is missing in the marketplace -- and the opportunity is there for someone to build this -- is an "iTunes" or even "YouTube" for indie film. Netflix is in development on something like this; time will tell if they launch it, and if it will truly mean money for filmmakers who get their movies accepted there for downloading. But Netflix does has the customer base and traffic, and that is significant.

Even if Netflix doesn't go through with this (but I think they will), someone, some site, will become the major site for indie film. And when all the above factors become less problematic, we will then see decent money that can be made by a lot of filmmakers. It's just a matter of time.

As far as what the major problem with broadband is, that report pretty much says it. Broadband has been slow to grow -- it was not that long ago that I couldn't even get broadband at my residence, here in LA! -- and the lack of competition has also kept growth lower than other countries. What's interesting, is that the U.S. is among the lowest in broadband speed among many countries around the world.

I get 2-3MB download speed, which is the best I can get where I live, but were I in Japan or South Korea, I'd get 100MB download speed. Given the U.S. "built" the internet, it's ridiculous that we are now near the bottom of the ladder with speed and accessibility among the major nations. And all of this has had an impact on the
growth of digital downloading. - Jerome - J. Courshon - courshon@yahoo.com

Source for free (yes, FREE) ideas, pictures & footage

The Internet Archive is building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.

Like a paper library, we provide free access to researchers, historians, scholars, and the general public.

The Archive's Moving Images library consists of free movies, films, and videos. This library contains thousands of digital movies which range from classic full-length films, commercials, to daily alternative news broadcasts, to videos of every genre uploaded by Archive users. Many of these movies are available for download.

CLICK HERE...

http://www.archive.org/index.php

Thursday, February 21, 2008

HANDCUFFING

I'd like to know what the members feel about "handcuffing yourself to the script".
- Anthony Peterson - peterson.anthony@gmail.com

************************************************************

A very interesting question Anthony... to me, at least. I think the first question is, how strongly do you feel about the material? Is it a personal vision? Are you the only director who could possibly do it justice?

I am polishing up a new script and soon may be facing these same questions, as I start to show it around.

Selling a screenplay would be a breakthrough in and of itself for me; I wouldn't mind quitting my day job (marketing and advertising) and just starting in on the next screenplay.

On the other hand, I've pitched this particular idea a few times, and the way people's eyes light up, makes me think that taking the money and walking away would be a missed opportunity.

On the other hand, I may discover that if I insist on staying attached as director, it may be the deal-breaker. So... would I sell my baby? If the price was right. - John Harden - giantspecks@yahoo.com

************************************************************

Unfortunately when you are untried, even suggesting that? you would like to direct, even if you are willing to give it up will have a lot of silence.

It suggests to some that you will have unreasonable expectations and demands.

Best of luck with figuring out what the way to go should be.

I use this metaphor called "The Bimbo Side of the Force" -- when you get to a contractual stage it is up to you how much you are willing to compromise.

John, you have a PR background -- so do I. I'd try to stipulate being involved in the marketing and PR in some way -- if not actually leading the team on a low-budget production, making yourself available as? resource to write releases and do interviews for a mid or higher budget production.

While the biggest markets might not want to interview the writer, if you've had an interesting life or have some star-studded anecdotes, there will always be some speciality publication or program that will want to interview you.

And if you really want to stipulate either having approval on the director allowing yourself to be included on some of the pre-production meetings with the director, being present at table readings or staged readings,? you can ask for that before you sign off on the script. - Rachel Kadushin - BestFriendsProd@aol.com

************************************************************

As someone who's been trying for a long, long time ... with a little success, I have this to say to answer the query below: if you are interested in a deal with a studio or a mini-studio to finance a feature film, you'd be crazy to handcuff anything to anything.

If there's a market for the script, sell it. Unless you have dazzled someone big time with a short subject award winner (and even then there are no assurances), you will commit suicide it you attach yourself to direct (if you are a relative nobody).

This is a mercenary business. Nobody wants to take a chance on a first time director. They'd rather you take the chance...raise the money from private investors, produce the picture yourself, let them see it when it is finished or after you've made it to a festival (after your investors have borne the entire risk) and then -- I'd say a one in several thousand chance, no kidding -- perhaps make you a low-ball offer which only partially gets your investors out and leaves the distributor free to creatively bookkeep the rest and go straight to dvd.

The Little Miss Sunshine example or Napoleon Dynamite or even Blair Witch are one in 50,000 chances to make a name for yourself and be able to sell your next script with your self attached to a studio instead of your dentist and rich uncle. The industry likes to publicize these pictures to keep you working on spec.

Major film cities (LA, NY, London) are riddled with waiters and janitors and car parkers who hung onto their idealism and passed up an offer that could have kept them working and perhaps building a career. The attitude that you are going to be the one in fifty thousand is one that most often can be found in young and untried talents.

It does not take long to learn that this is a business through and through, and you got to take what comes and leave the pre-conditions out of the room. Handcuffing is dangerous to your future.

One person's opinion. - Barry Opper - Laughop@msn. com

************************************************************

This is an interesting question that I often bring up with many of my clients. And here is my general outline.

1. getting anything sold, produced, directed, and distributed successfully is the most important thing.

2. when your project is sold, it will advance your career further than anything else, including directing your own feature, unless it's the next clerks, brothers macmullen, or swingers.

3. if you do not have a history of directing, specifically features, you will have trouble breaking in. There are tons of great stories out there about people who have spent years directing music videos and tv commercials and still haven't broken into features.

4. you will hamper your film's progress if you are tied to it. whether acting, directing, producing, etc, your film's budget will go into freefall if you insist on being a huge part of your production, specifically your first.

5. if you can create a script that gets made for even $1 million dollars, you have a huge amount of leverage for the next movie. If it gets made for $100 million, not only will you have a really nice payday, but you'll probably immediately land an agent who can work for you and help you to direct the next one.

6. the goal of a studio is to make their money back and much, much more. Their goal is to make a project as commercial as possible so that it can go on to double, triple, or more their initial investment. they need to hit theaters, foreign markets, cable, internet, and home video. if they like a script, but request changes, make them at the beginning and don't stop until they're happy.

6. in this business, the idea is king. if you prove that you can do one script, then another, and you are a team player, then you have a shot. If you sell a show, or a script, you're foot's in the door. then you can use that tiny bit of leverage to do something else.

7. studios and producers want to back a proven commodity. You wouldn't go to someone who has never handled money before and ask them to do your taxes, would you? And you wouldn't ask someone who is an accountant and ask them to invest your money in mutual funds. So why would a studio that sees you have a good script automatically think you can direct?

8. the truth is you are nobody right now. if you get attached to a script, you will never agree to changes a studio wants. the key is to be able to say, "anything you want", so getting attached is one of the worst things to do.

9. a question to ask yourself about directing, writing, producing, or doing anything in this business...would you be happy doing it on a small cable channel, for the rest of your life? because you can probably shoot for that and make it, and those are the people who work , and keep working, because they are team players.

10. Finally, write tons of scripts, and try to sell them all, don't get attached to scripts whether in first draft or final product. There's no point in spending days, weeks, or months on a script that you don't think will sell. That's just bad business.

So, i know that's a lot of information, but it's a good backbone of what to think about because every client that I have without an established portfolio I tell the same thing to...this script is gonna have to change a lot, make a list of the key dealbreaker points and unless those are hit, change it, and on the first one, eat crow with a smile. Remember, it's a marathon, not a sprint. There will be plenty
of time to pick your battles when you are in a strategic position to do so. It's a rough business, but it's quite rewarding.

- Russell Nohelty - noheltyr@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

DISTRIBUTION OF YOUR FILM...

I am a Temple grad and I teach screenwriting and film courses at two universities in Philadelphia. I review films online. I like to help out/network with other film people even though I do not get out as much these days. I am shooting my film "Aftermath" in May. - David

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117980978.html?categoryid=2508&cs=1

I think it is absolutely crucial that all indie filmmakers read this article. I deal with so many wide-eyed would be filmmakers who think that they can turn on their camcorder for two hours, run it through their Mac, submit it to Sundance and become the next Tarantino.

In reality, there are something like 4000 indie features produced in the US every year and, of those, maybe 200 will ever find some sort of distribution.

So, we filmmakers have to know the odds going in. Web distribution and VOD etc. are finally beginning to take baby steps towards catching on and I think we all need to pay attention to the situation.

Bottom line, I think the days of the $10,000,000 Sundance deal for your $10,000 feature are over but that doesn't mean all hope is lost. I think it means for us, that we should be making better and better films for less and less in hopes of seeing some profit if we are so lucky to even get picked up for distribution by someone who pays us close to, if not more that what we put into the film.

The real bottom line, no more turning on your camcorders for two hours, running it through your Mac and calling it a movie --- not that anyone on this list does that but I'm just saying....

Make really good movies that are both satisfying on an artistic level but also attractive on a commercial level, something that people will want to see and that distributor think they can make money on.

Remember, if it is a choice between your beautiful, artistic film about dough rising and the latests sequel to a remake about stuff blowing up, the average American multi-plex consumer is going to to go for the bang 9.5 times out of 10.

The emergence of single HD format: BLU-RAY

Diehard HD DVD backer Universal threw its support behind Blu-ray in the wake of Toshiba's pullout from the rival high-def format. Out of necessity, Paramount, the sole last major company backing HD DVD, is expected to follow suit.

Toshiba said it would stop production of HD DVD players next month in a rapid pullout from the technology. Last year, consumers spent under $300 million on sales of both high-def formats -- a tally that lags far behind the standard DVD sales at a similar point in that format's evolution.

Studios rang up $15.38 billion in disc sales Stateside last year, one and a half times more than the gross of theatrical releases.

Hollywood 2008: Fewer sequels, more risks

The Oscars are upon us and after last summers' record-breaking box office, movie studios suffered from a relatively sluggish fall, casting doubt that box-office sales would top 2006's $9.2 billion.

The industry did surpass the $9 billion mark by the end of the 2007 thanks to strong openings for the Will Smith apocalyptic thriller “I Am Legend” (which set a December record by grossing $77.2 million in its first weekend) and the mix of live action and computer animated “Alvin and the Chipmunks,” which took in a whopping $44.3 million in ticket sales. Alvin!

2007 marked the second consecutive up year at the box office after a disappointing 2005, when grosses fell 6 percent.

Studios such as Viacom’s (VIAB) Paramount , Warner Bros - which like CNNMoney.com is a subsidiary of Time Warner (TWX) - Sony’s (SNE) Columbia, Walt Disney’s (DIS) Buena Vista and GE’s (GE) Universal were the big box office winners during 2007. Each studio captured at least 10 percent of the total U.S. box office.

Box office analyst Jeff Bock, with movie industry research firm Exhibitor Relations, thinks there is a decent chance that next year will top 2007 but that it’s far from a sure thing. That’s because many studios are taking a gamble by planning to launch would-be franchises next summer instead of relying on less-risky sequels.

READ THE ENTIRE STORY...by Paul R. La Monica
http://mediabiz.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/category/sony/

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

New TV Sets To Connect to the Internet

New television sets being manufactured this year are being equipped with outlets that will allow users to connect the sets directly to the Internet, the Los Angeles Times reported today (Monday).

The connectors will eventually allow them to receive television shows on demand, as well as weather forecasts, stock quotes, and YouTube videos, the newspaper noted.

George Kliavkoff, NBC Universal's chief digital officer, told the Times that while most consumers have shied away from additional set-top boxes for such programming, a connection built into the TV set is likely to have a chance. "It brings the ability to have unlimited channel capacity, personalized channels -- a celestial video jukebox in the sky," he said.

David Eun, Google's vice president of content partnerships, added, "This is about making content accessible to as many viewers as possible."

Thanks Craig D.....

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sounds a little like I-TV from Apple... only add the cable TV connection and it already exists... and with the TV you already Own.

Andy

Andy Collen
Producer/ Director
Happy Trails Animation LLC

andy@happytrailsanimation.com

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Frustrated indies seek WEB DISTRIBUTION

Frustrated indies seek web distribution But still face challenging online marketing gap

Of the 100-some features questing for a distributor at January's Sundance Film Festival, only a handful found the holy grail: worldwide theatrical distribution with an advance minimum guarantee and back-end participation from a real distributor.

With everyone making movies and an unforgiving and glutted marketplace for indie films, the cost of prints and ads to keep a movie in theaters is punitive for everyone and there's is no appetite for risk-taking.

The key question is, when will an alternative distribution outlet for indie films emerge-an outlet with enough viewers to bring in meaningful returns?

Netflix's Ted Sarandos says, "The long-range outlook for specialty film is to move more to home markets. But the marketing challenge is enormous." Netflix has partnered with other theatrical distribs such as Roadside Attractions (Sundance 2005 entry "The Puffy Chair"), Magnolia Pictures ("No End in Sight") and IFC Films (Cannes Palme d'Or winner "4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days") as well as online distrib B-Side to stream films on its Watch Now site.

After a minimal release of the credit-card doc "Maxed Out: Hard Times, Easy Credit and the Era of Predatory Lenders," over 65,000 people rented the DVD in its first week on Netflix, and over 35,000 streamed it on their computers.

IFC Films' First Take banner offers another model: day-and-date video-on-demand and pay-per-view through its cable and DirecTV partners, with an initial run at the IFC Center in Manhattan. Opening at the IFC Center means film reviews can help brand the title, since online-only releases aren't likely to be reviewed in mainstream media.
Terry Kinney's 2008 Sundance drama "Diminished Capacity," an HD two-hander starring Matthew Broderick and Alan Alda, will take that route.

Two of the hottest pre-fest titles, 2929 Entertainment' s $20 million Robert De Niro comedy "What Just Happened?" and Groundswell' s Michael Chabon adaptation "The Mysteries of Pittsburgh" were among the many that remained unsold at the end of Sundance. But while most name titles will eventually find homes, the smaller fish could easily end up dead in the water and many do.

Once filmmakers make the mental leap that Hollywood isn't going to offer them a $2 million minimum guarantee, they have plenty of other distribution options, from cable and self-distribution to the Internet. The problem lies in advertising expenses and getting the word out to sufficient viewers to convince them to download, stream or pay-per-view the pic.

So far, a large market for selling movies online has failed to develop. Tiny movies with micro-budgets are selling online, but while Amazon, Netflix and others are expending considerable effort in building these marketplaces, this is a nascent business. "The pure online approach is not generating returns," says B-Side's Hyams, who has recently partnered with IFC to air five new B-Side fest pickups on "Choice Indies" each month, promoted by 30-second spots both on IFC and online.

"We're in the transitional post-major studio pre-Internet era," says Emerging Pictures CEO Ira Deutchman. "Models will be clear in the future. We're still heading toward Web 2.0."

Filmmakers need to get past the romance of a theatrical release, says Cinetic Media's John Sloss. "People are so disproportionately preoccupied with getting their movies released in theaters that they're not interested in alternatives. You make more money and get more exposure and promotion on HBO."

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL ATTICLE By Anne Thompson From Variety, February 14, 2008

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117980978.html?categoryid=13&cs=1
This article is from Variety. If you found it informative and valuable, we strongly encourage you to visit their Web site and register an account, if necessary, to view all their articles on the Web. Support quality journalism.

Friday, February 15, 2008

World Premiere FEATURE FILM on the Internet

Like Scorsese and Spike Lee before him, Tanuj Chopra draws on his community to fashion his powerful tale "Punching at the Sun" of a young man's journey through grief and rage following a family tragedy.

Sundance Film Festival
Tribeca Film Festival
"distinctive, original, and iconoclastic" -- Variety

Debut director Tanuj Chopra's deeply felt coming-of-age story explores the ties of brotherhood and the struggle to move on after personal loss. When his older brother is gunned down in his family's Queens convenience store, teenager Mameet (Misu Khan) goes into a tailspin of anger and self-doubt. Confrontations ensue with family, friends, and enemies alike before a ray of hope appears in Shawni (Nina Edmonds), a spirited romantic who slowly lures Mameet out of his armor of hate and defiance, and helps him realize his self-worth and the world of promise lying ahead for him.

South Asian immigrant culture, post 9/11 politics, interracial relationships, violent streets, and the American firestorm of hip-hop culture all mix into a fierce concoction in Tanuj Chopra's vibrant and spirited first feature.

Elmhurst, Queens, is a rough place for Mameet Nayak, a beautiful 17-year-old South Asian immigrant with a passion for basketball and a hair-trigger temper. It gets rougher when his older brother, Sanjay, is gunned down in the family convenience store. The loss leaves Mameet in a complicated state of mourning and adolescent nihilism.

His rage and antagonism toward the world make him a magnet for trouble. His friends, Ritesh and Parnav, are hilarious company, though not particularly encouraging in Mameet's attempts to rise above the negative forces in his life. But an adorable neighborhood sneaker salesgirl, Shawni, offers a light of hope in cracking Mameet's self-destructive shell.

And inspiring rap performances by the charismatic MC Uncle Sonny conjure Mameet's ability to find a sense of optimism in a violent world that he feels is determined to view him as an outsider. Chopra draws passionate and genuine performances from his talented young cast led by the gifted Misu Khan. Urgent and contemporary, Punching at the Sun sheds light on an American perspective rarely reflected on the screen, and glistens with the freshness and vital energy of a new directorial voice.
- Shari Frilot, Sundance

Angered by his brother's murder, a New York teenager spirals into reckless hostility, until his bond with a spirited local girl gives him a shot at turning his life around.

The pulse of hip-hop, and the energy of youth thrive on New York City's sun-scorched streets in the groundbreaking film Punching at the Sun. We're thrilled to bring you the exclusive world premiere of this prize-winning Sundance selection, available nowhere else on the planet.

http://jaman.com/a/video/0HLrlmoB0QLQ/

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Financing & Distributing Indie Films

The State of Indie Film & Tips for Geting a Deal Done

In this exclusive video shot at the the 41st Annual International Quorum of Motion Pictures Producers, indie-film dealmaker extraodinaire John Sloss, founding member of Cinetic Media, explains the Ins & Outs of independent film financing, marketing and distribution, as well as the role the Internet can and will play in marketing today's films and distributing the films of tomorrow.

This very informative and priceless video is exactly what is wrong with "Hollywood" - everyone says, "Don't worry if you have a good story or not, just make sure that you have stars in your movie, and make it similar to something that has already been produced!"

TO LEARN MORE, CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO
http://aimediaserver4.com/studiodaily/videoplayer/?src=ai4/indiefilm/indiefilm.swf&width=475&height=300

Also available as a downloadable podcast:
http://www.studiodaily.com/main/video/8977.html
by Matt Armstrong for STUDIO DAILY © 2008 Access Intelligence LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

CAN YOU TELL IF A SCREENPLAY WILL BE PROFITABLE?

David Maisel (DavidM@DancingCatProds.com) wrote and asked: What are the most important aspects of a screenplay that indicate possible profitability and project viability?

**********************************************************

My answer would be: Is the storyline coherent and compelling? It should be coherent to anyone who reads it; as far as being compelling, it needs to be compelling to the people in a position to finance it (or put you in touch with financiers).
Of course, profitability and viability also depend on the above-the-line elements that are attached -- i.e., director, stars, exec producers. For example, if your screenplay is compelling enough to Tom Hanks to make him want to get involved, you're set. - Paige (paigegold@earthlink.net)

**********************************************************

Yes, Paige, but what makes a SP compelling?

David A Maisel (DavidM@DancingCatProds.com)
http://www.DancingCatProds.com

**********************************************************

Assuming that the story line works, isn't the issue of compellingness (?!) really very subjective? I mean, aside from a few major general crowd-pleasers like "Seabiscuit", people's movie tastes are so very different. For example, if someone had given me the first screenplay to "Porgy's" or one of those other young-male gross-out movies that became big moneymakers, I would have thrown it across the room. Obviously a lot of people did find it compelling, but I'm not part of the target audience. And when it comes to smaller, artier films, audience tastes are even more distinctively different. - Paige (paigegold@earthlink.net)

**********************************************************

It's that hard-to-define quantity I'm trying to get to.

David A Maisel (DavidM@DancingCatProds.com)

**********************************************************

Write or acquire stories that you believe in, and then get others to believe in it, too.

Rachel Kadushin - www.BestFriendsProductions.com

**********************************************************

Here are some elements, in my opinion, that make up a great story (non-exhaustive, of course).

A fascinating beginning, middle, and end.
Repeatability- an audience wanting to go back again and again to relive the experience.
A good inciting incident with rising action and a powerful negation.
Characters that are dynamic in nature.
Not trying to reinvent the wheel, but telling stories that work with your own personal spin.
Passionate storytelling.
Knowing your target audience.
Knowing everything about your world, your characters, the antagonizing forces at work, and what the protagonist wants and represents.
Good use of metaphor.
Showing, and not telling.
The reader should feel how you want them to. Example: writing a thriller? Reading it must make the person feel that way!

I know these are broad comments, but screenwriters have the world to bring down into 90 pages. Anything is possible.

Joshua Caraballo (founder@minerva-films.com)
www.minerva-films.com

**********************************************************

Monday, February 11, 2008

YOUR HERO: DYNAMIC OR ICONIC?

Marc wrote:
I thought this might generate an interesting discussion. READ the full article by Allen B. Ury titled: YOUR HERO: DYNAMIC OR ICONIC?

http://fadeinezine.com/
©2008 FIPG, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

This article relates directly to an issue I had in working on my most recent script.

I followed the recommended strategy of watching a bunch of movies whose plot and subject matter were similar to the one I wanted to write. I knew it was going to follow the basic pattern of being a police procedural in which forensic clues are used to track a murderer, so there were a large number of possible movies I could model it after (many of them awful). Some of the ones I liked included "The First Deadly Sin" (1980), "Cop" (1988), "Silence of the Lambs" (1991), "Red Dragon" (2002), and, though it didn't follow the pattern as closely as the others, "Gone Baby Gone" (2007).

What surprised me after analyzing these and other movies of this type, however, was that almost none of them featured the sort of dynamic hero who undergoes a transformative character arc that I thought a successful, conventional movie was pretty much required to have. In each case, the hero, usually a detective, was tough and determined when the movie started and was still tough and determined when it ended, though maybe a little wiser or angrier. In several of them, it's the villain who transforms, becoming more and more dangerous before ultimately being killed by the hero.

Clarice in "Silence" may go from being a trainee to a graduate while heroically confronting her fears and defeating her antagonist, but such a change, as I see it, is not on a par with the sort of complete metamorphosis that a dynamic character undergoes, ending up in nearly the opposite place of where he started out. From Clarice's very first appearance, it's evident how ambitious and driven she is, how badly she wants to succeed as an FBI agent.

As a contrast to the movies above, I would offer "Disturbia" (2007). While also about stopping a serial killer, and having a lighter tone than the other examples, its protagonist undergoes a complete transformation, starting out as the lazy, depressed neighborhood loser and ending up as the focused, determined neighborhood hero.

Feel free, of course, to disagree with me on any of this.

Laura K. wrote:

I don't think a character arc has to involve a complete change in situation (slacker dude to responsible dad). Character arc can be a lot more interesting when it's subtle: a deepening of the character's cynicism matched by a corresponding feeling in the audience (Chinatown, Gone Baby Gone). Or a character's internal feeling of redemption. Gone Baby Gone is also an example of this -- the protagonist has the satisfaction of knowing that he's stuck to his principles, no matter how complicated the result might be. Clarice in SOtL had been troubled by a childhood memory of not being able to rescue the lamb (lambs? I forget), but achieves internal redemption at the end by finally saving a life. That's a lot more interesting than an external character arc where, say, she starts out under threat of being fired and ends up with a promotion.

One of my favorite movies, in which the protagonist doesn't seem to have either an internal or external arc is Ghost World. Enid is someone who refuses to give in to society's demands that she compromise her values, and she's mad as hell at everyone around her for doing just that. Even when she leaves town at the end, there's no indication that she's ready to change. We the audience can simultaneously admire her for her principles, while understanding that her stubbornness is a tragic flaw (and feeling kind of bad about all of the compromises we've made over the years).

David Negrin wrote:

Yeah, in TV it's dangerous to arc characters because people might not continue to follow the show. So you arc over a season or just stick with a shtick and hope it doesn't get old (always does).

I feel stories are always richer with a character arc to complement the external story arc.
I think originality is a major difficulty when trying to give a character an internal character arc. We've seen them all before and we can see them coming a mile away. Education plot, redemption plot, coming of age plot -- all story types that require internal character arc.

One way out, I think the "iconic" character as defined above enables you to try and drop your character into this iconic, superhero mold so we think he's static. Hide his learning (ambiguate it, if you literally hide it the audience will feel cheated) and reveal it to us at the end.

E.g. 3:10 to Yuma - Russel Crowe's character is the antagonist and he arcs! Great way to hide it. Crowe's character is the ultimate badass throughout the entire film, but we get hints of his humanity along the way, and hints at jealousy of a normal life and fatherhood like Christian Bale's character. In the end Crowe decides to back the underdog, even though he's the favorite to win just because he'd like to see him redeemed. And in his own way is redeemed for a life of crime. In a way, he's the Anti-hero, even though he seems responsible for the antagonism.

Christian Bale's protagonist arcs too, but it's surprising because he starts as a good father, then he is revealed to be more and more of a coward (tortured by it), then he's redeemed with bravery and Crowes' aid, in the end.

If you don't have a character arc, you better have one hell of a story arc: Indiana Jones, James Bond, Inspector Clouseau -- and how much better would those films be with an arc (Slight arcs for Indy in Doom & Crusade, hint at one for Bond in Goldeneye).

Marc wrote:

(I haven't seen "3:10 to Yuma" yet, but from glancing at David's comments it seems like I need to add it to my Netflix queue.)

I'll agree with Laura's comments about a subtle dramatic arc usually being more interesting than a extraordinarily transformational one. There are examples when the latter type can be done so that it feels seamless and natural, as in the "Godfather," but then there are other times when, to me at least, such plots can feel contrived. As funny as "Knocked Up" was, there were several points in it where I had trouble suspending disbelief, the stark change that the protagonist underwent in Act III being a big part of it. While I thought "Disturbia" was okay, it almost felt like the writer consciously engineered his script so that events in Act I were mirrored by opposing events in Act III, e.g. in Act I the brats next door play a practical joke on the hero, setting up the scene in Act III when the hero will play a practical joke on the brats next door.

Back to the subject of iconic heroes, I was thinking of how the Jason Bourne trilogy and Season 1 of "Dexter" both followed a similar trajectory in that the main thread of each involved the hero filling in gaps in his memory and gaining a better understanding of who he was and why he was so different. Both concerned the "birth" of a virtually superhuman character. (However, I also think the amnesia device has also been overused and can seem cliched.)

Relating to the above, I remember hearing that a revelation or an explanation generally does not make for an interesting climax, and in the case of "Bourne Ultimatum," I felt disappointed by the final confrontation with the doctor who had headed the program that "created" Bourne. Other than the fact that the program was conducted (somewhat impractically, I thought) in an Upper East Side high-rise rather than an isolated military base, it seemed predictable. The revelation at the end of "Dexter," on the other hand, took me completely by surprise.

Mike P wrote:

The main point of an Iconic character is that he or she doesn't change "in the face of a whirlwind of chaos or change around him". This is why they are so appealing. They stick to their guns (principals and beliefs) in situations that would tempt the normal person. They present images of strength and resolve... a type of stubborn courage that we wish we all had in tough situations. They are our "mentor" hero's. Tom Hank's character in SAVING PRIVATE RYAN is a good example.

Sometimes their personal courage is tested; they are tempted by the base "sins" that seduce us all and the suspense and interest in the character is waiting to find out if he or she DOES submit. The climactic question is "Will he or won't he".

This is why most noir films, especially Detective stories (The Maltese Falcon) and TV series (BATTLESTAR GALACTICA) feature iconic heroes. Each scene or episode is another "test" of their principles and mental skills. In a sense they are "heroic" in their stubbornness. James Bond is constantly tempted by women, power, money et al but in every case, although he may "dabble" in sin (gambling, drinking, casual sex etc.) he does so for the fun of it, but ALWAYS comes back to his center and gets the job done. He is heroic BECAUSE he is tempted and can walk away, unscathed. Something we all fantasize we could do.

Sometimes the iconic hero's stubbornness results in tragedy to themselves and or the allies around them. These stories can be some of the most dramatic and emotionally charged. KING KONG (even though he's "not human") remains unchanged despite all the trials he?s put through, ultimately giving his life for love.

Traditional heroes teach us HOW and WHY we need to change. Iconic heroes teach us that sometimes we need to "keep the faith" no matter what.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

APPLE & THE FUTURE OF MOVIE DOWNLOADS

In the mid-1990s, Time Warner spent $10,000 a customer in Florida to demonstrate that downloading movies over cable lines was technologically possible and feasible. In 2008, movie downloads are still stuck in the "proof-of-concept" stage.

Apple's announced plans last month for an online movie rental service could be the spark that sets movie downloads alight in consumers' minds but not because Apple is offering a fundamentally new twist on VOD; because because it's Apple.

The movie download market today is remarkably similar to where online music was several years ago when Apple launched its first iPod. Back then, MP3 players dominated the marketplace. But they were largely niche products and most music that was played on them was pirated. Apple created the first cool digital music player that people wanted to own.

Steve Jobs was also the first technology executive with the heft in Hollywood who could actually cut deals with studio executives to allow enough legal content online to create a marketplace and demonstrate that making money from digital music was not only possible, but practical.

In 2008, most consumers still aren't all that interested in cable companies' movie VOD offerings -- largely because the studios are so worried about piracy and cannibalizing their existing TV syndication and DVD businesses that they haven't supplied enough really good product to interest subscribers.

Movie downloads from services like Netflix and CinemaNow are still largely a curiosity for hobbyists and people who don't know how to download the pirated stuff.

Until today, Apple hasn't fared that much better. It's sold only about seven million movies, compared to about four billion songs and 125 million TV shows.

Jobs has once again persuaded the studios to make vastly greater stores of content available to consumers. In exchange, he gives the tacit promise that he can create enough of a market to offset the inevitable increase in piracy that will occur when millions of new consumers realize how easy it is to download and share movies on their computers, iPods and TV sets. (Just look at the movie piracy rate in Korea, which has the world's most ubiquitous broadband).

Apple's movie rental service could be exactly the spark Hollywood needs to jumpstart its online cinema business. Or the spark could become a conflagration that devours industry profits. Or it could flop once again, just as so many for-profit video-on-demand ventures have since Time Warner first dipped its toes in Orlando.

The only certainty is the movie downloads -- legal or not -- are here to stay.

Read More by Michael Stroud>>>

© 2008 iHollywood Forum Inc.
https://www.swiftpage2.com/ihollywood.marketing/C080118120700/speasapage.aspx?addr=63429

Saturday, February 09, 2008

OLD MOVIE POSTERS LIVE AGAIN

This is a fully licensed poster that has been converted to 3D from the original painting used in 1977 to promote the Star Wars movie using Synthetic Dimensions' proprietary Syndimation process.

To try and show the depth and detail Syndimation makes possible, we have prepared the animation running above. Don't be fooled by the competition. Other posters claiming to be 3D just look like pop-up books with a few flat layers giving an idea of depth. As you can see in the little movie above, our process results in a truly deep, 3D scene and allows us to incorporate special effects such as the glow from the light sabres and the shine on Vader's armour!



Is this what movie posters of the future will look like?

LEARN MORE...

http://syndime.com/StarWars.html

Friday, February 08, 2008

Teen Book Video Award Winner

Student Filmmakers from across the country have competed to create book videos for three of the hottest teen books of 2007. On November 26th, winning videos will be streamed over this newly designed event website, Expandedbooks, as well as across many other distribution channels.

SEE THE WINNER AND FINALISTS>>>

http://www.kirkusreviews.com/kirkusreviews/book_video/index.jsp

Expanded Books proudly presents the winners of the Teen Book Video Awards! Top student filmmakers showcase their talent with video spots for hot titles. Congratulations to Katie Koskenmaki, who won for A GREAT AND TERRIBLE BEAUTY.

LEARN MORE>>>
http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=607733078&channel=203704147

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Internet Downloading No Threat

Internet Downloading No Threat, Says Netflix CFO

It is likely to be a long while before movie downloading becomes a significant challenge to the DVD rental business, NetFlix CFO Barry McCarthy told an investment conference in San Francisco Wednesday.

"There are 100 million DVD players in U.S. households," McCarthy told the Thomas Weisel Partners Technology, Telecom & Internet Conference.

"If you really think people are going to stop renting DVDs, you need to lie down until that thought passes." As reported by Video Business magazine on its website, McCarthy also suggested that Netflix may raise the price of its rentals for high-definition discs if those who rent them begin to represent a significant factor in online rentals.

samheer2005 - samheer@pacbell.net

1st ANNUAL NOVEL FILM TRAILER COMPETITION

The FIRST ANNUAL NOVEL FILM TRAILER COMPETITION is looking to judge the cinematic works of both new and veteran indie filmmakers. There is NO entry fee for this competition. For the winners and honorable mentions we provide cash prizes, personalized website domains, permanent website exposure for their films, beneficial marketing, and more.

The contest will conclude with a screening festival of the three winners and seven runner-ups in Los Angles, summer 2008. The news will be press-released and marketed to film websites and magazines.

The goal in creating this annual competition is to produce a series of high quality, independent short films that will not only stand on their own as important and provocative works, but also bring worthwhile and socially relevant literary novels to the attention of a larger audience.

We are also looking to create a list of good indie filmmakers available for future projects initiated by authors and publishing companies desirous of making intelligent use of the film medium to promote books.

More information about the contest, including entry form, guidelines, trailers, log, novel synopses, etc., can be found at http://www.novelfil mtrailer. com . We also have a separate AUDITION VIDEO competition to complement the main competition in which participating filmmakers place their audition videos on YouTube or Blip TV or Video Google.

So what do we mean by a "novel film trailer"? In this context, a film trailer created from a single scene or scenes found in a novel-length work of fiction (published or in production) and designed to give the audience a window into the mood, energy, and theme of the story.

The primary goal of the First Annual Novel Film Trailer Competition is therefore to produce an ongoing series of high quality, independent short films that will not only stand on their own as important and provocative works of cinematic art, but also bring worthwhile and socially relevant literary novels to the attention of a larger audience.

Currently, no true novel trailers exist that depict scripted, interactive scenes. Upon conclusion of the NFT competition, all that will change.

The secondary goal of the NFT Competition is to prove that both an audience and readership exists for dramatic, socially important books and short films with strong theme, and that success does not depend on the habitual application of television-like marketing formulas.

The current NFT competition begins February 20 and continues to May 20, 2008. The novel in our 2009 competition will be chosen from a large number of works submitted for consideration by independent and commercial presses nationwide.

LEARN MORE>>>

http://www.novelfilmtrailer.com/

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

CANON'S VIXIA HV30

Independent filmmakers and videographer's playing with micro-budget and no-budget films will rejoice upon learning that there's a new kid on the block.

The Canon VIXIA HV30 with 24p and 30p modes is the latest in Canon's dramatic offering of consumer HD camcorders. This camera incorporates many advanced features that bring the ultimate in HD video and digital photo quality knowledgeable and demanding videographers.

The VIXIA HV30 has Exclusice features you won't find anywhere else. Canon's Full HD CMOS sensor and advanced DIGIC DV II image processor deliver breathtaking detail and the best in color reproduction while Canon's SuperRange Optical Image Stabilization and Instant Auto Focus gives you the shot control demanded by High Definition.

With Canon's Genuine Canon 10x HD video zoom lens and a host of other advanced features the VIXIA HV30 is sure to be your choice in High Definition camcorders. And, with its HD and Standard Definition recording modes, you can make the move to HD without making your SD equipment obsolete.

The vast experience Canon has with photographic and broadcast television cameras with optical excellence, advanced image processing, superb performance, and the latest in technological advancements makes all this possible. Canon has long been the leader in bringing advanced features to its many products, taking advantage of their superiority in optics and image processing.

The VIXIA HV30 is easy to use and delivers the high level of performance many videographers have come to expect from Canon. It's the next logical step in premium quality High Definition camcorders for which sophisticated and discerning videographers have been waiting and it's available now.

LEARN MORE...

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=177&modelid=16206&WT.mc_id=EM0801CG01022&cmpgn=cn&Lead.LeadID=10ebc692d5800&Lead.Email=cdigitalv%40yahoo.com<YP=FRIENDS&Lead.FirstName=&CollateralRequest.CollateralRequestID=6662CR1000022247
©2008, Canon U.S.A., Inc. All rights reserved.

Monday, February 04, 2008

BUDGETING and SHOOTING RED

Dear Folks:

I did some research a few months ago on budgeting for shooting on the Red camera and on it's ilk (the Phantom, which was out earlier). The bottom line: if you want a quality image that's endlessly tweakable in post, you're in luck, BUT don't think that the Red it's the white knight that will save your indie film budget.

PEOPLE:
-- You absolutely need to budget for two days of checkout time for your ENTIRE camera crew and ASSISTANT EDITOR. This will give them enough time to check the gear out at the rental house and one day to play with it. During this second day your assistant editor should be loading up the drives or cards into the laptop using RedAlert! or RedCine so you can see what you've shot.
1. DP = 2 days labor
2. 1st AC & 2nd AC = 2 days labor
3. Ass't Editor = 2 days labor

STORAGE:
-- 4K data takes up a LOT of storage space. So budget for an array of hard drives. For a feature shot on a 20:1 ratio (which is not unusual on an HD feature, as opposed to film) you're looking at:

1. 107Gig ~ 1 hour of footage (this is going by Red's own estimates)
2. 20:1 = 40 hours of footage = 4280 Gigs, or 4.2/4.3 TB
3. List price for 4.3TB eSATA array * 2 (you want redundant copies) =
$575 for controller/array * 2boxes + $300/drive*10 drives = $4150

You'll also want drives for editing your rough cut and/or shuttle drives as well

RENTAL:
Here's where it gets sketchy. Prices from folks I've talked to varied widely. You'll notice that very few prices are available online. There's two reasons for this:
-- Since the market is in flux, it's best not to lock in a fixed price
-- The camera is designed as an a la carte system, so your final rental price depends on what you get with it.

As a package, here's what I would budget for:

-- Red body
-- Red EVF
-- Red LCD
-- Red Powerpack (don't know how many batteries you get)
-- Red production pack (includes rails, handheld grips)
-- (1) or (2) RedDrives (320Gig) - no downtime
-- Set of 35mm prime lenses
-- The normal camera gear from here: sticks, mattebox, etc.

Some also say you should rent RedCards (8 Gigs) but I'm not sure that's necessary, unless you're creating scene files on camera and storing them to the cards

Most places I talked to wouldn't rent the camera without one of their guys along for the shoot, and that person probably ain't cheap. Based on Phantom prices, here's what I came up with:

-- $2K/day for package; possibility of 2-3 day rental for 4-week shoot
-- $500/day for guy

Since demand is higher than supply at the moment, some rental companies didn't want to consider renting to an indie company right away; they want to make money on commercials.

POST:
During shooting, there is a on-camera option to create Quicktime proxy movies after each take. I wasn't able to find out how long this takes. In all likelihood, you'll be doing this when you load your footage onto your permanent storage using RedAlert or RedCine. Either way, you'll do your picture edit on some form of lower-rez Quicktime file.

Then you'll go into an online suite and conform your material, just as you would in a "normal" DI, except you don't have to scan in and dustbust reels of negative (significant savings). Your post costs here will be roughly equivalent to a DI from HD, depending on what format you want to end up on and what resolution your DI is (if you've shot 4K, you'll probably want to do your DI at 4K for 35mm, 2K for HDCAM, HD-SR res for standard-def delivery, etc.). Each house does its DI a little differently, but it boils down to the same general process: scan/load, conform, dissolves/opticals, title, correct, output, submaster, archive.

Note that you can do some "sweat equity" work if you transcode your footage to something your DI suite understands BEFORE walking in there (you can, theoretically, use RedCine to transcode your footage to TIFF or TARGA files, for example). Don't assume your post house's software understands RAW files! (I got burned in a Quantel suite because it couldn't understand HDV. I had to transfer my material to HDCAM and transcode some of it to uncompressed HD. A very expensive, timeconsuming problem). Also don't assume your post house's people know everything about your format - check it out yourself, AND budget for some tests.

Keep in mind that the plasticity of Red's format means you can do a lot of tweaking in post. However, it doesn't mean that this tweaking is free! So you shouldn't think that you can save ALL your creative "look" decisions until the last stage. At the very least, it'll cost you more money (online editor/room time isn't cheap). On the other hand, being able to scan through the footage with RedCine means that you can make some judgments before you get to the online.

NET RESULT:
I'm predicting that you'll see RED eat up approximately as much of your budget as a super16mm shoot, one way or another. I'm not going to get into a debate on the merits of HD/4K vs. film.

I think the Red is a great tool and will replace 35mm on a lot of shoots (commercials come to mind immediately). You get the flexibility of film without the hassles.

For indie filmmakers with $500K - $1M budgets, I say look at what the Red rentals will do to older HD technology (Sony F900/F950 or Panasonic HDX900/Varicam/ HPX500) prices. These days, almost any camera you pick up will deliver a terrific image; as always, it's up to the skill of the people handling the gear. My personal conclusion
is that if I have to choose, I'd rather get a superior DP and camera crew that costs a little more and give them a not-so-top-of- the-line camera.

If you've got $1M - $2M, then the RED can up your production value considerably over existing HD cameras while enabling you to shoot a lot more coverage than 35mm would. You avoid film's "issues" but retain many of its advantages.

Please note that as the situation is changing very rapidly (more Reds are available every day), you may find the rental rates dropping from my above quote. The best advice is to go to the rental houses nearest you for direct quotes (most didn't even want to give me quotes unless I had an actual project in front of me).

I hope y'all are well.

Best,

Arthur Vincie
Chaotic Sequence, Inc.
www.chaoticsequence.com
info@chaoticsequence.com