Wednesday, January 31, 2007

PURA VIDA


IT WAS A FOUR MONTH SURFING ADVENTURE.

California to Costa Rica.

Just the three of us. No film crew, no one following us around. Just Chris, Derek and their dog, Roscoe. They travelled down Baja, took the ferry across to mainland Mexico, made their way through Central America (Guatamala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica) and to their final destination, Costa Rica.

The transportation wasa 1984 yellow school bus which was converted to a motor home. It had two beds, carried the surfboards, a palce for the BBQ, bikes, fishing poles, 14' inflatable boat with a 25 H.P. motor and one spare tire.

On their adventure through these countries tehy hit some graet stuff, meet some interesting locals, and go through some crazy little towns. It's one surfing adventure to never forget.

LEARN MORE & SEE THE TRAILER...
http://www.puravidathemovie.com/Trailer.htm

YouTube to Share Revenues—But With Whom?

YouTube's announcement that it will begin some sort of revenue-sharing program opens a Pandora’s Box of legal, ethical, and business questions.

I came across YouTube co-founder Chad Hurley’s recent announcement that the site will begin revenue sharing quite by accident. I was in Nova Scotia, driving through a blizzard and listening for the weather report on my way to a place where neither my cell worked nor broadband internet connections existed, when a radio announcer read the report and offered a bit of color commentary. With a day of travel ahead, I had plenty of opportunity to assess what the move might do to the industry—and the negative impact it may have on consumer-generated content.

But I’ll start with the positives. YouTube is right to figure out a revenue-sharing model for its content generators, for three primary reasons. First, the decision is wise since YouTube's success has been built on the foundation of consumer self-expression, whether lip-synched odes to a teen's favorite pop star or consumer talking heads defending YouTube's decision to self-police copyrighted or inappropriate content.

These consumers, with varying levels of talent and tools ranging from cell phones to nonlinear video editing software, have created a great destination that ranks up there with eBay, Google, and the Drudge Report as a crack content/diversionary site.

READ MORE...By Tim Siglin
http://www.streamingmedia.com/article.asp?id=9496
Copyright ©2007 StreamingMedia.com, an Information Today Inc. company. All rights reserved.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Open Source Realtime Video Editing And Effects Software: Jahshaka

THE BEST REASON TO USE THIS SOFTWARE:

IT'S FREE!

If you are familiar with names like Adobe, Alias, Apple, Avid, Discreet, Eyeon, Media100, Newtek, Pinnacle, Sony, Quantel you will be surprised to find out that there is an open source, video editing and post-production software that is FREELY available and that just awaits you to be downloaded, installed and put to good use.

Called Jahshaka, this grassroots real-time video production powerhouse integrates multiple fully featured modules including a frame-by-frame paint over video facility, a production titling component, full video and audio editing, animation, and a special effects lab.

With this technology you don't need to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars to produce video that is as good as its editor. No need to buy a set of brand name applications that can do the same while emptying your wallet. Jahshaka is capable of playing ALL major media formats from Flash and .avi to Quicktime, Windows Media and Real. It plays uncompressed video sequences and makes it possible to view and even edit video in any format or resolution.

LEARN MORE...
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2005/02/22/open_source_realtime_video_editing.htm

BUMPING OFF BURT

BUMPING OFF BURT has been in production as a HD feature comedy for the past year. It's finally nearing completion and director Greg Steiner hopes to have the first screening this spring.

"Bumping off Burt" first came across his desk back in the Spring of 2006. Greg had been in development on another script called "Jacking Katherine", which was optioned two years earlier. His production company formulated a business plan, hired the attorneys, prepared offering documents, and set out to find the money to make the film…

As Greg tells it, "Two years and hundreds of hours of hard work later, we had exactly what we started out with...nothing. Countless meetings with potential
'investors' had left me with nothing but empty promises and an aging business plan."

"As a commercial production house, we already had HD cameras, lighting and grip gear, editing systems, and a full recording studio for ADR, foley, post production, scoring and mixing. So we figured, why not just make a film with what we had that could be used as leverage to find the funding for the other projects I wanted to do?"

"So Jacking Katherine was pushed to the back burner and we started the search for another script... one we could produce on an affordable budget that wouldn't require us to hunt down additional investors...and then there was "Burt". I knew I wanted to film a comedy, and it had to be easy to shoot without any extravegant locations...something I could shoot in our local area since we didn't want to use up our budget on travel expenses."

"After a brief search, I found what I was looking for. A strange little comedy called Bumping off Burt, written by Malcolm McClintick. I immediately called Malcolm to see if he would be interested in 'partnering' to make the film. We discussed our vision for his script (which fortunately was the same as his), arranged all the paperwork and "Burt" moved into pre-production just a few days later."

"Bumping off Burt" was produced and directed by Greg Steiner. It stars David William Cabrera (Burt), Bryan Power (Harry), Bruce Linser (Paul), Michael Kebe (Mike), Elisabeth Boggio (Kristin), and a host of other talented actors. It was filmed on location in South Florida in the summer of 2006 and is scheduled for a 2007 release.

JVC contacted the production company about the project when they heard that the entire film was shot using their small format GY-HD100 camera. Based on their conversation and the materials provided, JVC agreed to take the "film" under their wing and promote it as a kind of poster child for JVC digital cinematography. Free publicity like this can never hurt your independent film project.

The first press release from JVC will hit all of the trade magazines on Tuesday. P.T. Barnum once spoke about "good" publicity and "bad" publicity and remarked that "All publicity is good; just make sure you spell the right".

LEARN MORE...
The film's official web site is now on-line at www.bumpingoffburt.com

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Film of the Moment: 51 Birch Street

51 BIRCH STREET is a film I never set out to make.

I mean, who in their right mind would choose to delve into some of the most personal aspects of their parents' relationship, much less reveal it for public consumption? This was the farthest thing from my mind a few years ago when I went to visit our suburban family home for the last time. I did bring my digital camcorder with me, but it was just to capture the house I grew up in one last time for posterity. And maybe get to the bottom of a few things.

A lot had happened in the past year: my mother, who I was very close to, had died without much warning, and three months later my father, who I was not so close to, had moved in with his secretary from 40 years ago. They quickly married, sold the house, and now were about to leave the area for good. It was all pretty shocking in its suddenness.

And while I certainly wanted to know more about my father and Kitty's relationship, I was also philosophical about it: Dad's 83 and, well, good for him, he's moving forward, life marches on, and all that. Then I walked inside and saw our entire family history being packed away in boxes and it all hit me like a punch in the stomach: although I hadn't lived there in over 30 years, on some very primal level I still thought of this place as my home.

It soon became apparent that my father, who's from that generation of WW II veterans who rarely if ever talk about themselves, was not just willing but was eager to talk. And that my camera was facilitating the conversation by allowing me to ask the difficult questions I could never have asked otherwise. I saw a unique opportunity to get to know my father better, so I
decided to keep coming back.

It was during my next visit that I asked Dad, offhandedly, if he missed Mom. "No," he replied. "It wasn't a loving association, just a functioning one." Since I had always thought my parent's 54-year marriage was a pretty model one, needless to say I was stunned. I started to review the many hours of verité footage and interviews I'd shot with my parents over the years. I had done it originally just for my sisters and I to have as records of our family history, but now I was looking at it from a very different viewpoint.

I also poured over the thousands of photos and slides my father, a photo hobbyist, had taken over the years, as well as a number of rolls of 8mm home movies he shot back in the early 50's.

It suddenly began to feel like telling my parents' story on film was pre-destined. But then there were the 3 large boxes filled with my mothers' diaries. I wrestled for a long time over hether to even read them, and longer yet over whether to include them in the film. Later, during the many months of editing, I struggled with how to show them on screen.

My mother was a very complicated person who I loved dearly. Trying to pick just the right words and phrases to do her justice, yet not overstep the bounds of propriety, was an enormous responsibility. LEARN MORE...By: IFP
http://www.ifp.org/features/newsitem.php?id=116
51 BIRCH STREET - A FILM BY DOUG BLOCK

Making Movies

Making a movie is easy.
Pick up a camera, pick a subject, pick an angle, shoot and put it all together in one of the many inexpensive digital editing software packages available today. Then pick a format, tape, DVD, electronic file, and show off your masterpiece. It’s as easy as, well, making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Now you’re laughing. But a peanut butter and jelly sandwich isn’t as easy to make as it first appears. Have you ever tried to give someone directions to make a pb&j sandwich? You can’t spread the peanut butter until you’ve opened the jar, gotten a knife and taken out two pieces of bread. The minutia escape first glance. Making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich suddenly becomes more than it appears. Making my first short movie was much like learning to how to make a pb&j sandwich: it was really easy, until I was actually doing it myself.

This analogy isn’t completely accurate. Making a movie is even simpler than making a pb&j sandwich because, as you’ll see, there are only two real ingredients. There are, however, many more steps in making a movie. Independent moviemakers have even more steps to take than Hollywood moviemakers because they generally end up wearing most, if not all, the hats on their productions.

Take me for instance. On my first short movie and master’s thesis, Drive Thru Love, I acted not only as producer and director, but writer, editor, location scout, prop master, driver and even director of photography at times. Everything that needs to be taken care of during the course of a production fell on my shoulders.

READ MORE...by Stephanie Higgins
http://www.tailslate.net/articles/index.asp?ID=18&lst=n&dpt=articles

Saturday, January 27, 2007

RITE OF PASSAGE

Independent filmmakers examine and look at everything. While it's true that the overwhelming majority of indy filmmakers concentrate on the horror genre, everything is fair game.

Cops Are People First, Cops Second - "There's a tradition of hero cops in movies and on television, dating back to at least the early 1930s, when crime films really became popular," said "Rite Of Passage" film director Chris Dickerson.

"And right behind that, came the flip side: the bad cop, the cop gone wrong, who succumbs to corruption because of money or a gorgeous girl or whatever," the director added.

"All that's been done to death - sometimes better than other times - and neither depiction is particularly accurate to the way things are. Police officers are like any other human beings. Good things are done for bad reasons - and the other way 'round."

The LAPD officers in "Rite Of Passage," played by Jim Neville and Josh Austin, don't fit into the traditional "good cop-bad cop" mode, according to Dickerson.

LEARN MORE...
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=138650025

WRITE A SCREENPLAY in 30 days?

FIRST...

Are you serious about getting your screenplay down on paper and into the hands of directors and producers? If you are, this is the first step towards the final production of your pending creation, a step that most people are afraid to take. So give yourself a pat on the back, and let's get started!

Setting pen to paper... Sounds easy, right? Often getting started is the hardest part. Let's get right down to the business of writing almost from the first page of by answering honest questions about your hopes and dreams. So, let's start off by asking two of the most important questions you should be asking yourself right now:

What motivates you to pursue your dream of becoming a screenwriter?
How will you persevere through rejection?
Grab a pen and paper and WRITE DOWN your answers to both. Don't just answer them in your head, get them down on paper. You're a writer, dammit, or at least you'd like to be, so WRITE!

These are tough questions, but critical ones. And if you're going to be serious about a career as a screenwriter, you're going to have to be sure of the answers to both. Hollywood has no time for flakes. Get serious here!

Now you have what every high school student dreams about -- the permission to mark your own work. How are you going to assess your answers?

Well, imagine you are a top producer and you have to screen 100 wannabe screenwriters to mentor for the next 12 months. Now, imagine your very reputation rested on your being able to choose the right guy. Fail and you'll be a laughing stock. Would you be impressed enough to award the project based on the answers you see in front of you?

There are no 'right' answers to either question, but be sure of this: you need to be damn sure of your commitment. You'll need to want this more than anything and be prepared to do whatever it takes to get it.

Why? Because you're going to get rejected. Lots of times. So if you haven't got a thick skin, you better start working on getting one. If this doesn't come across in your answers, go away, think about it and repeat the exercise. Do it a dozen times if necessary.

We make no apologies about dwelling on your motivations for doing this. Being a success in this business is 10% raw talent and 90% motivation and committment.

the entire process from setting goals to completing your screenplay. You're then walked through the process of submitting your manuscript to agents, producers, and directors and taught how to hone your pitch and how to handle rejection.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

GOOD SCRIPTS and BAD SCRIPTS

ARE THESE THE TOP TEN SCREENPLAYS? (Amazon.co.uk)

CASABLANCA (1942) - 'I came to Casablanca for the waters' 'What waters? We're in the desert.' 'I was misinformed.'
THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION (1995) - 'There's a small place inside of us they can never lock away. Hope.'
CHINATOWN (1974) - 'You gotta be rich to kill somebody, anybody, and get away with it.'
JAWS (1976) - 'We're gonna need a bigger boat.'
PULP FICTION (1994) - 'I don't know, I didn't go into Burger King.'
BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID (1969) - 'Who ARE those guys?'
FARGO (1996) - 'I'm co-operating here'.
NORTH BY NORTHWEST (1959) - 'That's funny.' 'What?' 'That planes dustin' crops where there ain't no crops.'
THE 25th HOUR (2003) - 'I want you to make me ugly.'
THELMA AND LOUISE (1991) - 'Let's keep going.'

Writer's Guild of American West publishes this list of the 101 GREATEST SCREENPLAYS

Question: At times, people in the industry have said they wouldn't know the difference between a good script versus a bad script (besides the obvious - bad plotline, cliches, bad or unnatural dialogue and too much exposition). Do you agree?

A good script doesn't always make a good movie. And sometimes a bad script makes a good movie. Case in point: How many people cringe to some of the same dialogue in good and bad movies? Yet, many people love it.

A writer friend once told me all the "rubbish" they put out in the theater makes him feel confident he has a shot in the industry.
I'd like to hear your thoughts, thanks. - Bob, NY

Answer: It's very easy to tell GREAT SCRIPTS from VERY BAD SCRIPTS and TERRIBLE SCRIPTS. It's much harder to tell GOOD SCRIPTS from VERY GOOD SCRIPTS but it's hardest of all to tell GOOD scripts from BAD.

"I've done script coverage at major studios & read scripts that have won National competitions & it is truly a crap shoot. You don't know if you have a good movie until you get in the cutting room and even then, sometimes it's hard to tell. Taste and the collaborators' ability to find truth & meaning in the template laid out by the script are the only true indicators of a "good" movie. If the sequences fall flat and the characters ring false, it is a good indication that the script is bad, but not always."

"Most good movies are fundamentally fairly simple & simple is harder to do than one would think. Unfortunately, the film industry is NOT about making good movies, it is about making money. The "rubbish" put out every year is only proving that the industry is getting worse and worse at identifying how to make money." - Akin Salawu, NY

SITA SINGS-Feb 15, Cinema Arts Centre, Huntington, NY

Celebrate the day after Valentine's Day with a work-in-progress screening of the Greatest Break-Up Story Ever Told: SITA SINGS THE BLUES!

This will be the most extensive show of the work-in-progress yet, featuring ELEVEN musical episodes (10 Hanshaw songs plus a new ditty by Rohan) and the first-ever public screening of the latest chapter, Agni Pariksha. Plus, chapter 4 - Battle of Lanka - will be on glorious, colorful, dazzling 35mm FILM!

But hold onto your hats - we'll also be showing Fetch! and Pandorama on 35mm, and The Stork and some other goodies. Artist/Producer Nina Paley will be there in person, answering questions and babbling away.

RESERVE THE DATE!!! February 15, 7:30pm
Cinema Arts Centre - 423 Park Avenue Huntington, NY 11743


The whole feature film won't be completed until 2008, but there's a good 40 minutes here.

Taking the train: From Penn Station, 34th Street and 7th Avenue, take the LIRR, Port Jefferson Branch. Get off at Huntington. Train schedule is available at Penn Station, or call516-231-LIRR (718-217-LIRR). An off-peak round-trip ticket costs around $14.50 (one-way: $7.25 / peak one-way: $10.25). From the station, the easiest way to get to the Cinema is to take a cab (roughly $5.00).

Nina Paley - Animator/Illustrator/Cartoonist
http://www.ninapaley.com

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

METAMORPHOSIS


Some relationships do last forever...

Some love affairs will kill you. Some will let you live forever. Along the lines of Roman Polanski’s “Rosemary’s Baby,” METAMORPHOSIS deals with the supernatural in an offbeat, edgy way. This love story transcends time and space, and explores the strength of the soul and the heart. METAMORPHOSIS creates a paradox: even if something kills you, it makes you stronger.

When three young, carefree Americans on an Eastern European trip pick up an exotic and beautiful stranger, Elizabeth, they can’t foresee that she’ll take them on the journey of their lives. As Keith, a novelist fascinated with ancient mysteries, and Elizabeth fall in love, they set off a series of events that puts them all in mortal danger.

The group ventures through the mountains to a medieval castle, where they soon discover that their survival depends on outwitting and eluding supernatural forces. As the fast-paced, horrifying action accelerates, sections of the story’s Rubik’s cube begin to lock into place. Then, with a surprising twist, along the lines of the “Sixth Sense” and “The Others,” the plot takes a sharp, mind-bending turn.

Some people have a fascination with the paranormal; others have a passion for horror and action. METAMORPHOSIS offers something to whet everyone’s appetite... even a vampire’s.

THE MAKING OF...
http://www.cinepartners.net/projects/projects.htm
http://www.cinepartners.net/metamorphosis/index.html

PITCHFORK


Independent horror films still form the largest genre and segment of indy productions. And is it any wonder why?

A young woman hopes to put her mother's demons to rest when she and a group of friends venture to the farm where her mother suffered a brutal attack. What they find instead is that some demons are better left undisturbed.

PITCHFORK from Wit's End Films is written by Matt Holly & Jack Monroe

SEE Pitchfork: The Promo...
Director : Jack Monroe - Starring: Kira Pozehl and Sonny King

http://www.witsendfilms.com/promo1.html

Sunday, January 21, 2007

WRITING THE ROMANTIC COMEDY: ADVICE

Photo: (c) Warner Bros. John Cusack, left, and Diane Lane play a couple who meet on the Internet in Must Love Dogs, a romantic comedy that warms without overheating.

According to Billy Mernit, all the Hollywood studios--and most major actors--"are actively seeking romantic comedies."

I'm a sucker for romantic comedies. Watching stories about cuddly, charismatic couples falling in love can turn this hard-bitten cynic into a mushy puddle of Jell-O in no time. They're this writer's Achilles' heel. You could show me the worst romantic comedy ever made, and I'd still probably find something good to say about it. So, I was delighted to come across Billy Mernit's "Writing the Romantic Comedy."

Although I've done some screenwriting in my time, my head isn't exactly bursting with ideas for romantic comedies. But since I'm an admirer of the genre, Mernit's book felt like a guided tour through a favorite building when you don't have any plans to construct a building of your own.

Hollywood producers notoriously hate to read, so if you're a Hollywood writer, you need to pick up a few tricks to make reading as easy for them (or their surrogates) as possible. As a writer for the entertainment industry, Mernit has obviously picked up a few tricks of his own, making his book a brisk and enjoyable read. The historical overview is appreciated almost as much as Mernit's disassemblies of some of the rom-com's stand-outs to show how the genre ticks.

Although the book is sprinkled with a few factual errors (for example, on page 177, he refers to author Milan Kundera as "Polish" instead of Czech), these aren't enough to upset the taco stand. Mernit's explanations of the genre's components are straightforward, artful, but clearly presented. And his dubbing of the Mr. Wrong character (a convention in many rom-coms) as the "Bellamy," after actor Ralph Bellamy who specialized in such roles, had me laughing out loud. My only criticism of the book is a mild one: There ought to have been at least a handful of movie stills illustrating some of the films that Mernit talks at length about -- this would have heightened the book's visual interest. I highly recommend "Writing the Romantic Comedy" even if you're not a screenwriter. Understanding how the genre works may make you appreciate it even more.

I do have one word of advice for aspiring screenwriters: If you're just starting out in the craft, you won't want this to be the first book on the subject that you read. Start off with something that teaches you the nuts and bolts of scribing for the movies, like "Screenwriting" by Syd Field or one of its clones. Next, I would recommend "Writing the Character-Centered Screenplay" by Andrew Horton, which talks a little more in depth about the vital components of character and structure.

For good measure, you might also want to check out "Making a Good Script Great" by Linda Segar for advice about how to tighten a screenplay. Only then will you want to give Mernit's book a thorough going-over. If you're an old hand at screenwriting, you're probably already familiar with these books.

Once you've got all of them under you're belt, you'll be inspired to sit down at the keyboard and write and write. It may only be your name over and over, but you'll still be inspired to write. - Robert Payne

WRITING THE ROMANTIC COMEDY by Richard Payne

READ MORE REVIEWS...
http://www.amazon.com/Writing-Romantic-Comedy-Billy-Mernit/dp/0060935030/sr=8-1/qid=1168436442/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-4345201-4528845?ie=UTF8&s=books
© 1996-2007, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Camera 101: Rule of Thirds

Make your shots more dynamic by using the Sweet Spots...

You just received a new camera for the holidays. Now it is time to take some great dramatic shots over the next year. One thing you can do to make your images more aesthetic is to use the Rule of Thirds.

The Rule of Thirds is not necessarily a rule, as much as it is a suggestion that tends to add more tension, energy, and interest into your photo. It works like this: when you look through your viewfinder, divide the image into thirds, both horizontally and vertically.

We call the points where the lines cross The Sweet Spots. When we look at a big blank area, our eyes do not automatically focus on the very center of the image. Instead, our eyes naturally drift toward one of these points.

So how can you use this bit of knowledge to create beautiful images?

When you shoot a landscape, try placing the horizon along the upper or lower third of the image and not in the center cutting the scene in half.

READ MORE...By Stephen Schleicher
http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=91953

When not working deep in the labs of the DMN Central Division testing the latest and greatest software/hardware products Stephen Schleicher can be found at the local university teaching a few courses on video and web production. He can be reached at schleicher@mindspring.com. You can also visit him on the web at www.stephenschleicher.com. For even more fun listen to Stephen's Podcast The Coolness Roundup!

HD DVD or Blu-ray?

The explosion in the early 80s of VCRs and home-video rentals did for the adult industry pretty much what TV did for pro football.

Pornography videos in the HD-DVD format may be hard to find but some were on display at the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo.

It's a dirty little secret that's not all that dirty (or secretive) for those who follow technology trends. The porn, or "adult industry" —to use today's preferred nomenclature—tends to serve as something of an oracle when it comes to predicting which technologies eventually make their way into the marketplace and which ones won't. If you want to know where consumer technology is heading, look to "porno" and "war," or so the axiom goes.

It was the adult industry that played a major role in shaping the future of American home entertainment 25 years ago. Suffering from stagnant theater and video-booth revenues, the industry made a bold decision to shift toward a new method for distributing its content.

At that time the porno industry cozied up to a budding VHS format in lieu of what many considered to be its superior Betamax cousin. Granted, Sony (the progenitor of Betamax) had a lot to do with that ultimate decision, essentially refusing to let its burgeoning format be sullied by pornography hawkers. But nevertheless, when the adult industry gave the thumbs up to VHS, the result of the format war was pretty much a foregone conclusion.

What followed then is now common knowledge, but today, Even the Porn Industry Won't Touch HD.
READ MORE...Bryan Gardiner - ExtremeTech
Copyright © 2007 Ziff Davis Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Content originally published in Ziff Davis Media publications is the copyrighted property of Ziff Davis Media.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20070119/tc_zd/199033

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Make An Independent Film

Our stories were first shared around flickering tribal campfires. Today, movies flicker in that darkness, illuminating something about ourselves, reminding us that we are connected. You don’t need $100 million budgets, CGI effects, or a submarine. You need vision. After all, bigger campfires didn’t mean better stories. Good thing, too, because you don’t have a submarine. You have a vision.

READ MORE...
http://www.mydream.tv/dream_category.php?dc=8f14e45fceea167a5a36dedd4bea2543

THE DIRECTOR'S CHAIR

Screen direction is perhaps one of the most confusing yet easily remedied problems in directing a video production.

We are often tempted to place our cameras so that we get the cool background behind our talent as they move through the landscape. However, sometimes when we move the camera, we inadvertently change the direction the talent is looking.

We will now take a look at the 180-degree rule, continuity, cutting on action, camera and talent movement and basic blocking. Never again will you have to resort to the age-old trick of reversing the image because the talent is looking in the wrong direction.

The 180-degree Rule
Some call it the "Motion Vector Line," some call it the "Sagittal Plane Rule," and still others call it the "line of action." But most in the film world know it as the 180 Rule. What is it? The rule that will always serve you well to make sure your talent is always looking or moving in the right direction on the screen. It works like this: If you have two people talking or an object moving in a specific direction, draw an imaginary line through them in the direction they are looking.

By making sure your camera never leaves the 180 degrees of space on the one side of the line, you can be sure your subject will always be looking or moving in the same screen direction. If you are taping a conversation between two people, make sure the camera never crosses the imaginary line that runs through them. If you stay on the same side, your talent will always be looking towards each other. If, however, you cross the 180 line, they will both be looking in the same direction.

When shooting a parade, a race, a chase or any other movement that has a specific direction, always make sure your cameras stay on the same side of the action. If you decide to shoot the basketball game from the home side of the court, all of your cameras have to be on that side so that you don't have the players making baskets in their opponent's goals. The only way around this is to make sure you put a graphic on the screen that says "reverse angle."

If you are taping a car chase, decide if you want to shoot the chase from the passenger or driver's side of the cars and do not deviate from that plan, no matter how cool the background looks at various locations. The instant you decide to switch sides, the cars will no longer be chasing each other; they will be crashing into each other or running away from each other! Not a good outcome to the chase!

If you are taping an actor chasing another, decide if you want to tape from the left or right side and again, stick to it. Just imagine how hard it would have been for the cowboys to catch the cows if you shot the cowboys from their left side and the cows on the right. They would eventually meet in China!

READ MORE...by Robert G. Nulph, Ph.D
http://www.videomaker.com/article/12986/?label=enews200701
(C) www.foxsearchlight.com/sunshine

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Writing the Film Script

With big budget films, a good script is doubly important, because so much money is riding on it. For the most part, Hollywood has ignored the concepts of good story and three dimensional characters. And in exchange for that, independent films have risen in popularity and have gained respect in the mainstream. It isn’t difficult to take the time to make characters more interesting, or making the story more plausible or more exciting. Unfortunately, many producers don’t seem to realize this.

As an example, I will site what I call “How To Handle Alien Invasions for Dummies” — Independence Day. This tale is almost a perfect rehash of War of the Worlds, and it disgusts me because Emmerich and Devlin have never acknowledged this. They keep calling it an homage to the Irwin Allen disaster films, which it is not. The film is also a rip-off of the mini-series, V, as well as a number of other better alien invasion films.

The characters are basically cardboard cutouts and none are terribly interesting except for Randy Quaid. As for the story, it is full of holes — how does a laptop computer link with an alien computer to upload a virus? — and the dialogue is weak. The only redeeming quality of the film are the special effects, which shouldn’t be the best part of any film. This movie cost about $100 million to make, yet the producers made no effort to take the time to devise a stronger story. While the movie was a hit, it became something of a joke to many viewers who questioned the logic of the plot and its success was based solely on the action and effects. The problems could have been fixed and the producers would have had a stronger success if they’d simply taken a little more time to make sure the script worked.

READ MORE...by Michael Sheridan
http://www.tailslate.net/articles/index.asp?ID=2&lst=n&dpt=articles
Copyright ©2005-2006 Web Wiz Guide

Clint Goes Digital

How Clint Eastwood Blended Film and Digital Workflows for Twin Iwo Jima Epics
Clint Eastwood has a reputation for economical, straightforward filmmaking that is a bit out of date — at least in the opinion of Clint Eastwood. During a recent chat, the director pointed to his twin World War II movies, Flags of Our Fathers and the Japanese-language, English-subtitled Letters from Iwo Jima, as proof of this assertion (both were among The National Board of Review's Top Ten Films for 2006, with Letters winning Best Film).

Both films were shot under grueling conditions back-to-back at faraway locations; both involved experimentation by Eastwood's team with digital cameras, both required far more extensive visual effects than Eastwood normally deals with, and both brought the filmmaker into the digital intermediate process for the first time.

“Everybody says that ‘I hear you do everything in one take,’” Eastwood says. “If I did everything in one take, you might not [like what you see]. Let's just say I do what it takes to get the material right. When it seems right, I move on and don't stay around beyond when the job is done. But that reputation...I sometimes joke about it. I'm willing to do whatever is required, and [these two films] required a lot."

“It's true that I'm old-school in the sense that I have worked with a lot of people who are not afraid to print and move on if they like something. I do like that decisiveness, and the fact that you can make up your mind. I understand that John Ford was like that, and he is certainly an idol of most directors. But I'll experiment when the situation calls for it."

"I know people who still won't [edit on] Avids, but I've become very comfortable with the Avid. So I'm not at the point where I [should be considered] a traditionalist. I have to keep investigating and keep up with the times.”

PODCAST-CLICK HERE-Clint Eastwood on Letters of Iwo Jima
http://digitalcontentproducer.com/podcasts/audio/podcast_eastwood_1206/

READ MORE...By Michael Goldman
http://digitalcontentproducer.com/di/depth/video_clint_goes_digital/
© 2007 Prism Business Media Inc.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Naming Your Baby: How to Find a Great Title to your Screenplay

How exactly does one work on the title of their screenplay?

I recently came up with such a wonderful idea for a movie, one of those miraculous moments, like finding money on the sidewalk. I told somebody, and they said, "Great. What's the title?"

Suddenly, and rather horrifyingly, my beauty of an idea is crippled. Instant orphaned bastard! You wanna strangle the person. You feel insulted. What's the title!? Why would you even ask that, like, right after I told you this incredible gem?

Well, of course they would ask that. Every movie needs a name. But unlike nearly every other aspect of screenwriting, there are no techniques to titling your script. We can practice the three act structure, workshop our dialogue, check the arcs of our characters, but what craft is there to naming your movie?

The first movie I wrote that was made was entitled LOVE LIZA. The movie was about a man whose wife has committed suicide. She has left him a note, and the movie is the story of his struggle to open this letter and read her final words. I remember finding this title fairly quickly, the name clearly referencing an element of the letter left behind. But what I found to be most interesting about this title was the lack of punctuation----the title wasn't LOVE, LIZA.

When the press kits started to be put together, I had to keep reminding everyone there was no comma between LOVE and LIZA. The comma-less title takes on a different meaning in the context of the movie. I was lucky to find a title that meant one thing before you watched the movie, and meant something else after you're done.
Sometimes titles come long before the screenplay has even started.

I have come up with great titles that have no idea at all behind them. They function as stakes in the ground. I got so angry with someone for complaining about the shoes I was wearing that I vowed to write a movie called WRONG SHOES. Soon after, I came up with an idea of a girl taking her video camera to her cousin's bachelorette party, and starting casting, with an intention to write, develop and workshop the screenplay, WRONG SHOES, with the cast.

Once we got into the second draft of the screenplay, the title, WRONG SHOES, didn't fit the tone of the story, and we found another, and renamed the movie, A COAT OF SNOW. This title strikes people a myriad of ways, and even after watching the movie, the audience is left to fit its significance.

So how do you get a great title to your screenplay? Well, the first thing you gotta do to find the great movie title is write a screenplay. You can find a great title before you write a screenplay, but then you don't really have a title problem, you have a missing screenplay problem.

I asked a flight attendant once what the snack they just handed me tasted like and they said, "Plane food." I loved that. I thought, that would be a great title for a movie. Who knows what the story is, but there it is, a great title. But no script.

READ MORE...by Gordy Hoffman
http://www.bluecatscreenplay.com/news/naming_your_baby.php
©2007, Bluecat Screenplay Competition

2 products that will change communciation forever

I'm not sure if anyone saw Steve Jobs' keynote address at Macworld, but Apple introduced 2 new products that I think are going to revolutionize home television and mobile communication...

Apple TV is a new way of watching internet-based programming. You can download movies and TV shows from the internet as well as from your computer. AT&T started something like this and there are a few other companies like Akimbo that are out there too. Apple TV is a bit unique in the way it can be hooked up to a computer though...

The IPhone is truly incredible...A phone, a widescreen IPod, a PDA and an internet device all in one unit. And the way it's designed and the fact that it runs OSX makes every phone on the market look about a hundred years old.

Keep an eye out on these things because both of them are going to effect the entertainment / video / film production industry. -Sean McKnight

The way I see this really changing the movie industry, is how movies are made. Most movies these days are made to fit 1.5 to 2 hours because an audience doesn't like to sit that long. But I can eventually see a new dynamic showing up with people using cell phones that support video to keep them entertained on long trips, at work, and who knows where else. But I can see the return of serialized movies.. Imagine a world where the initial movie comes out... And tells a story..

But if you want more, you can get it in three months as a one hour episode, and in another three months as another hour episode, and so on.. This usually goes on for a year. At the end, it is slightly re-edited to look like one smooth movie, and released in whole at select theaters for the few that would love to see it all together on the big screen.

If you haven't seen it on your cell, you pay $20 for the remaining 4 hours. If you have seen it on your cell, you can show them that you have the clip (which probably cost you something to download) and you get in for $7 for the 4 hours, or free if the download cost was enough.

I realize there are some potential issues with all of this.. But I can see a golden age of story telling coming out this way, because the movies can be extended for those that care and fit in all the things that usually need to be sliced and diced in the screenplay adaptation process.. -Brian Egendorf


Check this stuff out here:
http://www.apple.com

Monday, January 15, 2007

GOD HAS A RAP SHEET

Kamal Ahmed, is the writer and director of "God Has a Rap Sheet", and has achieved international success as a member of "The Jerky Boys" - a Grammy nominated multi-platinum comedy act who reached their summit in the mid-nineties when Touchtone Pictures released the feature "The Jerky Boys - The Movie" which premiered number two in the country.

The late nineties saw Kamal leave the Jerky Boys to pursue filmmaking as he filmed and directed the Documentary "Artists of Hell's Kitchen", which won Best Director of a Documentary at the New York International and Independant Film and Video Festival 2000

A native New Yorker, born in 1966 and raised in Astoria, Queens. He is the son of a Bangladeshi father and Trinidadian mother (His father gained success by starting "Little India" - a row of Indian restaurants on East Sixth Street, Lower East Side NYC). An accomplished bassist, Kamal is also scoring "God Has a Rap Sheet" with his band Sacred Groove Posse.

He attended the High School of Art and Design in the early eighties and it is there where he got his first exposure to filmmaking by changing his major from commercial art to motion pictures. Kamal left Art and Design to go to City-As-School, where he graduated. It was there where Kamal got his first exposure to show business when he was discovered outside of school by a casting director and put in an after school television program in 1984.

Playwright giant and actor John Ford Noonan plays GOD in this independent film. Noonan, who penned such classics as "The Year Boston Won the Pennant" (For which he was nominated for a Pulitzer in 1969), "Some men need help" and "A couple of white chicks, sitting around" (A huge hit off-Broadway, in which screen actress Susan Sarandon starred). He also gained success in television for writing many "St. Elsewhere" episodes (and achieved immortal heights by winning an EMMY in 1985). John has also become a cult movie hero by playing diverse roles in the movies "Next stop, Greenwich Village", "Adventures in Babysitting", "Flirting with Disaster" and "Subway Stories".

LEARN MORE & SEE THE TRAILER...
http://www.godhasarapsheet.com/

Jimmy Whispers Returns to Mulberry Street

The gangster-Mafia genre is rated as one of the most popular themes watched on television today. Jimmy Whispers Returns to Mulberry Street, encompasses all the elements that make the Sopranos so well received among audiences—family, food, principles, pride and tradition but with less violence and more Disney sensibility.

In this piece, the hero, Jimmy Whispers—(played by Clem Caserta—whose credits ranged from such films as Analyze This (1995), Casino (1994) and The Bronx Tale (1993) to name a few), returns to his neighborhood after serving 5 years in prison to find the streets corrupted with drugs and crime. His job, as head of the family, is to bring back the place people remember as a safe, comfortable community where respect was "understood."

Caserta also the director of the film said, "I wanted to make a movie Italian-Americans would be proud to watch". This movie represents those million of viewers who love and are loyal to this genre, but also the millions of unhappy Italian-Americans who feel programs like the Sopranos show Italians as brutal, murderous thugs.

This movie won the Audience Award at the California Independent Film Festival. People can't get enough of it! If you haven't seen it, you don't know what you're missing out on. It's got loads of Staten Island charisma and features the Island's hot spots as much as the actors. This beats the Soprano's anytime with less violence and more charm. This movie is Clem Caserta's directorial debut. He's starred with Robert DeNiro and Chazz Palminteri in favorites like "The Bronx Tale" and "Casino.

READ MORE...
http://jimmywhispersactingschool.com/html/jimmywhispers.html

Sunday, January 14, 2007

A FREE MINI SCREENWRITING COURSE

Paul Cooper has been a working freelance television and motion picture screenwriter for more than twenty years. His awards include three Emmys, the Humanitas Prize, and The Writer's Guild Award.

MorningSideWriters.com is a culturally diverse group of fiction, screenwriters, and graphic novel writers in New York City. We are avid readers, editors, and published writers who challenge each other to write better, reach individual and group goals, and kick each other in the literary pants.

We firmly believe that writers write! Writing is a solitary art.

Walking, sleeping, or having dinner, a writer's mind is always engaged. Family and friends of writers are sometimes apprehensive, especially when a writer's eyes are taking notes of the immediate area and ears are recording conversations.

The writers in the three groups have varied and complementary educational and professional experiences. We not only talk about the mechanics of writing, we write obsessively, and are voracious readers. We believe that writing can be taught if a person is dedicated and disciplined.

Click HERE for Paul Cooper's Mini Course in Screenwriting.(c) 2001, HollywoodWorkingWriter.com - All Rights Reserved.

THE MINORITY

"The Minority" has a rising star actor in the lead role, and is getting positive reviews. Accepted into a major film festival, THE MINORITY will premiere February in Los Angeles at an AMC Theatre.

SYNOPSIS: Jake Jackson's outlook on life is unusually upbeat and happy, but his life is changed dramatically when a series of events unfold under unfortunate circumstances. The true forces of nature around surrounding him could make even the nicest guy in the world loose his cool.

This will be a block buster independent film that will change the way people perceive independent films. Below are some reviews:

"The Minority is Fresh, New, Stylish"
- Ronna B. Wallace, Exec. Prod. Quentin Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs

"The Minority is a ambitious and courageous social commentary that questions the current state of race relations in the early 21st century. Passionately produced with strong camera work and a real New York film, this film dares to ask the question that many are afraid to answer. -Ben Lyons, 'The Daily Ten' on E!

The filmmakers who produced THE MINORITY are known to create superior quality pictures on a remarkably low budget! They made use of a wonderful group of previous investors, who are co-producers from notable film and theatre directors, to parents of celebrities to CEO's to "average" Joes.

The film was budgeted at $169,000.00 US, and was made under the SAG Ultra Low Budget Agreement. The status of the film is "almost" completed and money is needed to get some minor clearances, and E&O insurance so it can broadcast.

-We are now searching for a few more backers, who can take advantage of a good investment opportunity when they see one. We are offering a stake equal to 1% of the films worldwide net from box office sales, DVD and broadcast for $1689.00 US. All investments and contributions can be tax deductible, through our fiscal sponsor: DCTV (Downtown Community Television) 87 Lafayette St, NY, New York

LEARN MORE...
www.TheMinorityMovie.com

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Distribution Traps

Many people come into filmmaking unprepared. More goes into filmmaking than just making the movie, and like any job, preparation is important.

New filmmakers think they can simply make a movie and Hollywood will open its doors to them, without realizing that in doing so they have become Hollywood's competition.

Being a filmmaker is like being in the Olympics with one hurdle after the other to overcome. It's like playing a video game. There are so many unseen traps to avoid that most filmmakers never make a dime from their own work. It's all in the contract you sign.

I have received many contracts from distributors who say they are interested in my film. But none of them mentions any money "up front" - all they want is for me to sign their contract giving them my movie. But if you look at the small print of the contract it's obvious that I will never see any kind of profit.

Under the compensation clause in one contract I received was a little thing called "recoupable expenses" not limited to the following- all printed material, all shipping costs, duplication costs, trade shows, and so on.

This contract said that I would receive 50% net revenue, which is gross revenue minus any or all the expenses. But looking deeper into the contract it can be seen that they will be deducting anything they want to call an expense from money they receive. This means that I would receive nothing because the expenses are not limited. This is one of the many traps that filmmakers fall into.

Yes, you have your film in the video stores but who is now profiting from your work? Filmmakers need to operate like a business.

If you are going to be a filmmaker preparation is extremely important. Filmmaking is a specialized job. I took business law while in school and other courses that would help me. When I am not sure about wording in a contract I speak with an attorney, because knowing how to make a movie is not enough.

The contracts I have seen are legitimate contracts that we filmmakers are being offered. And filmmakers are signing away the rights to their films for up to 7 years based on these contracts which will make money for the distributor but not for the filmmaker.

I attended a film seminar in Chicago last year in which I was able to talk with other filmmakers. I spoke with the real filmmaker who sold his movie to Hollywood for $200,000 just to pay his film crew expenses. Maybe you've heard of his film "Meet the Parents". His film did not star Robert De Niro, it used unknown actors. He managed to get a sales agent and it was sold to Robert De Niro's Company who remade his film, using name stars, and released it by Universal. De Niro's company made millions.

His original film is now sitting somewhere in a salt mine where films are stored. To even get a screen credit for creating the original film he had to hire an attorney. He was given an executive producer credit. Now he wants to get his original film back, but Universal says they have no idea where it is, and if he did ever get it back he would have to change its name since Universal owns the copyright on the title.

The Blair Witch Project movie was shot for $40,000 and really took a bite out of the blockbuster Hollywood films which cost millions to make. It was great marketing that put that film over the top. Their website was brilliant, it caught your interest and was designed to lead you to believe that this was real and had actually taken place.

Blair Witch took in over 200 million dollars. The filmmakers did not see that amount as they sold it for much less than that. The distributors who bought it were the smart ones and caught Hollywood completely off guard.

LEARN MORE...by John Swanson
http://www.b-independent.com/production/distributiontraps.htm

SCARY AS HELL! A GREAT GHOST FLICK!

Following their daughter's brutal murder, a grieving young couple escapes the city to find solace in the mountains.

As they try to recover, they soon discover their new home is haunted by violent entities with tragic histories of their own.

DARK REMAINS
is a supernatural horror movie that will keep you on the edge of your seat. Following their daughter's brutal murder, a grieving young couple escapes the city to find solace in the mountains, only to discover their new home is haunted by violent entities with tragic histories of their own.

Creepy, Eerie, Frightening, Unsettling.....one of the best ghost films ever made. Even though this film was made on digital video all the interior shots are film-like. It is only the exterior shots that give the video away. Even so you cannot imagine how scary this film is. I viewed it on a big screen projector setup with 5 to 1 dolby, and the scares come unexpectedly.

I would not recommend this film for children or the faint of heart. It is incredible that a low budget film like this can deliver more Frightening terror than most grade a gimmick cgi Hollywood films. Congratulations to everyone involved with this movie. The shame is that most people will never see this film. A little masterpiece! See It yes, but don't watch it alone. - Anthony Capialbi

One of the Best Horror Films Ever Made
It is too bad that the masses will never get to see this film on the big screen. This is a classic horror film in the real definition of the word horror. It is a classic ghost story to compete with any of the Asian films. The good thing is that it is not a remake or ripoff of an Asian film.

It is an original. This film will get under your skin and stay there for a long time. If you like horror, this is a must see but be warned...it is not for the faint of heart. If you enjoyed the original Ringu...this is for you....only more frightening...this film won Best of Show at every alternative film festival it was screened at. - Duane Ackerman

LEARN MORE & SEE THE TRAILER...
http://www.darkremains.com/TRAILER/trailer.htm

Friday, January 12, 2007

Documentary: "Occupation: Dreamland"

Filmmakers embed with the U.S. Army in Iraq to find out 'what the hell is going on?'
In 2004, filmmaking team Garrett Scott and Ian Olds traveled to the Middle East with one goal: try to make sense of what was happening in Iraq.

"We became aware of this embedding program that was in place... We wanted to see if we could go in and see the war first-hand from the perspective of the soldiers. Also, we felt that people often represent soldiers in terms of why they do what they do, but no one really seemed to be asking them adult questions and actually seeing what they do and what they think about what they do."

The two men were embedded with the 82nd Airborne division of the U.S. Army, living in "Dreamland" — the forward operating base for the unit, named after a former Baath party resort in the area.

During their embed, Scott and Olds captured a very real look at what it means for soldiers to be an occupying force in a foreign country.

The trailer for "Occupation: Dreamland" and excerpts from an interview with Ian Olds will give independent "news" and documentary filmmakers an idea of the risks involved and the rewards of this type of filmmaking. Ian's filmmaking partner, Garrett Scott, died of a heart attack shortly after "Occupation Dreamland" was finished.

READ MORE & SEE THE TRAILER...
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs19635
Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

AIM FOR THE BIG TIME

LOCAL TALENTS
The crew bites back the bitter cold, as they attempt to get one of the lights to work. It keeps flickering, and the lighting crew is trying to fix it. 9 o’clock in the morning has come and gone, and they are just setting up. The shoot is starting behind schedule.

Russian super star, Irena Allegrova has arrived, and is getting ready to shoot her music video. Signs that the Cold War has melted away can be seen all over the set, as they prepare to film on the deck of the former United States Navy aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Intrepid, now the center piece of the Intrepid Sea, Air, Space Museum.

Just another day on the job for Ken Kushner. His company, Red Reel Pictures, is producing this music video. This is not the first time this Flushing-born director/writer/producer has found himself on the set of a music video. He’s been doing them since 1984.

“I always wanted to be a filmmaker,” says Kushner, who now lives in Bayside. “The first day I ever shot anything, it was so exciting.” And in this borough, he’s not alone.

Queens is simmering with a list of talents, all struggling to make it in “the business.” From actors to writers to documentary film makers, these up and coming stars are looking to make their mark on the silver screen.

READ MORE...by Michael Sheridan
http://www.tailslate.net/articles/index.asp?ID=1&lst=n&dpt=articles

Thursday, January 11, 2007

AUNT ROSE

Independent Horror!

When three vicious killers take refuge in a suburban home, they are prepared to wreak havoc on anyone who gets in their way. But what they don’t know is that this is no ordinary home – and no ordinary family.
Behind a locked door, there is one relative who will not hesitate to unleash her wrath of evil on anyone who dares cross her path...she is Aunt Rose.

The three sociopaths invade a suburban home to terrorize the family that lives there; one bedridden family member isn't going to take it (or them) lying down.
Johnny (Joshua Nelson), along with his pals Robin (Velocity Chyaldd) and Stewie (Kevin T. Collins), are thugs on the run from the law.

Debbie (Elizabeth Cooke) is a collage dropout living at home trying to get along with her parents. And Debbie's Aunt Rose (Marty Gargle) is a sickly woman that spends her days happily wasting away in bed content with the knowledge that Debbie is a healthy young lady with her entire life ahead of her. All that changes when Johnny and his pals force their way into Debbie's home and threaten the family, but Aunt Rose isn't too worried; she is a witch, after all.

Aunt Rose is a demented little film shot on a shoestring budget intent on furthering horror entertainment and making no apologies for showing things that will never get past the MPAA. The special effects sometimes work and sometimes don't, but all of them are generous and gratuitous. There are missed opportunities along the way, but the overall result is a fun, horrific success.
LEARN MORE...
http://www.myspace.com/auntrosethemovie

Thoughts on Making Films



Remember: Winners never quit, and quitters never win.

Anyone with a camera can call themselves a filmmaker, right?
#1 - Filmmaking is just a hobby and a non profession until you get paid to do, whatever you do on a set, ie - write, direct, production design, edit, spfx, you get the idea.
If I read a book on pulling teeth, then pull a few teeth, does that make me a tooth puller or a professional dentist?
No one can honestly consider themselves a professional filmmaker, until they get paid for what they do. Putting a short on YouTube or having a 15min. mini DV short running @ your local film fest does not constitute professional filmmaking, it's a start, but just the begining.
For the record, Zov Simons wrote a good book and desigend a "3 day film course" that's been hugely successful because of all the dreamy eyed amatuer/hobbiests that buy the book and take the class. Zov does not make a living directing or w! riting or filmmaking for that matter and the last time I checked, no one had hired him to do such in 20 years.
He pretty much admits this in his book - that he never was a good filmmaker, if he was, don't you think he's rather be making films than giving the same tired seminar over and over again?

Hollywood IS and always will be (for the majority) - a YOUTH driven business.
#2 - With very few exceptions, most "A" list directors started very, very young and had experienced an early celebrated success. From Speilberg to Coppola to Lucas to JJ Abrahms to Inarattu to ... you get the picture.
Of course there are acceptions, but the Robert Altman's of the entertainment world are few and far between. At any rate, it's best to start YOUNG!

It takes a lot more than a 3 day crash course and a book to make money in the film business.
#3 - Filmmaking is a career like any other and it takes as much time, probably more to develope your skills because of the nature and intensity of the competition.
Where else can you make a standard salary of around 30 grand for a week's work directing a sit com?
You get to have fun and get paid more than 90% of the American Population to have fun and the only guys making more $$ and having more fun are the stars and some of the writer / producer / show runners.

Filmmaking is so specialized these days that I think it would be
prudent to focus on a specialty.

#4 - If you want to hit pay dirt, the best way is to write and write and write then write some more, write tons of spec features, sit coms, 1 hour pilots, read lots and lots of books on screen writing structure and process.
The quickest way anyone in Hollywood earns respect, even a non professional filmmaker, is via selling a spec script.
I know more writers who never even went to film school, couldn't much less point a camera but, they were writers and provided the "CONTENT", that which goes up on the screen.
By the time 2nd or third season rolled around, they got to direct one, two even several episodes - then on to movies.
And that is how the Ed Zwicks and Paul Haggis did it.
It's a lot cheaper writing a script than buying land, gear, cameras, etc.

Talent - the Overlooked Necessity
#5 - There's one more essential element that no one has discussed and it is mandatory to succeed in "Hollywood" and that is Talent.
If you don't have talent in this arena, you'll pretty much be relegated to what I call the perennial class, always reading books on "How TO" always going to various classes looking for the answer to why you're not succeeding and it may be what all creative people fear.
You're just not talented to make it in THIS particular art form (for a lack of better words)
Everyone is talented, but not all are talented in this arena.

There is hope.
#6 - There are many arenas of production, so what if you can't write or direct, perhaps you've got exceptional organizational skills, you can prodcution coordinate or field produce, maybe you have a great eye for color, palates and a flair for style and clothes, whammo - you're in the wardrobe department, maybe you like playing with fire and used tp blow stuff up in the army- boom! you're in special FX, good with computers and graphic design, maybe a career in digital fx is beckoning you, good cook? - catering it really is a traveleling circus out there and if you rally want in the "business" there's probably a job out there on the crew that will get you closer to the action.

good luck
John Aguirre

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Make A Documentary


Movies aren't just entertainment for you, they are calls to action.

You see the power inherent in film. But there is a topic, a subject, an event that hasn't been documented to your satisfaction and you don't know why. The reason is simple: You haven’t made the documentary yet. You have a camera, a vision, and a point-of-view. You need only to begin.

Don’t Forget The Script!
Just because a documentary films real events and interviews, it doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a clear narrative. If it’s appropriate, write a detailed outline in advance. This will help you as you research your subject, and help you tell a compelling story. It might also save you the trouble and expense of filming things that aren’t really pertinent to your film.

Equip Yourself
You don’t want to be caught on a shoot with a dead camera battery or without enough film. If you’re filming real events, make sure you’ve got all the equipment you could possibly need or else you might miss out on a great shot.

Overshoot
Often you’ll only have one shot at capturing a moment in time. If you’ve got a crew, it’s a good idea to have several cameras rolling shooting ‘coverage’ so you’ll be able to edit together scenes with visually compelling angles and shots.

Edit With Intent
Editing is crucial to the success of a documentary. Taking real events and weaving them into a gripping story is both an art and a technical skill. Make sure your editor is with you every step of the way so that the two of you share the same vision for the documentary.

Think Outside The Cinema
The number of documentaries released into movie theaters is extremely small. While you should definitely send a synopsis and detailed treatment to distribution companies that might be interested in pushing your documentary into theaters, don’t neglect to gauge the level of interest among television networks. Many public television stations and private cable channels devote a significant amount of their programming to documentaries and your film might be a right fit.

LEARN MORE...
http://www.mydream.tv/dream_category.php?dc=8f14e45fceea167a5a36dedd4bea2543

Make your own movie



Want to make an independent film?

Learn tips from an expert.

Our stories were first shared around flickering tribal campfires. Today, movies flicker in that darkness, illuminating something about ourselves, reminding us that we are connected.

You don’t need $100 million budgets, CGI effects, or a submarine. You need vision.

After all, bigger campfires didn’t mean better stories. Good thing, too, because you don’t have a submarine; you have a vision.

LEARN MORE...
http://www.mydream.tv

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

TELENOVELAS flourish in SOUTH KOREA

Mad for Princess Hours

Love denied. Arranged marriages. Scheming power struggles between women with lots of hair spray. And in the middle of it all, a Cinderella and her Crown Prince who just wants—let's say it together—to direct.

Those who hallyu know of what we speak. Soaps have been the latest tsunami in the South Korean pop culture wave, and searchers have been intimate with past telenovelas like "My Name is Kim Sam Soon," "Princess Lulu," "Winter Sonata" and "Jewel in the Palace."

Now, a year after after its original airing, TV dramedy "Princess Hours," based on the ongoing comic "Goong," has returned to swamp the Buzz, with enraptured fans in San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Dallas and Chicago pushing the show into the top 350 searches. Lasting a mere 24 episodes, the drama reimagines a present in which royal line didn't end with Japanese colonization. Not everyone may be a fan, but most agree that the dramedy reeks of cutesy stars and big-budget glam opulence.

The show was made to appeal to Japanese audiences, according to Yonhap News, but "Princess Hours" has been a global phenom. DVD/VCD sales have blown past the quarter-million mark, even as it airs in wider Asian and American markets.

READ MORE...By Vera HC Chan
http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/59075/mad-for-princess-hours
VIEW KOREAN DRAMAS ONLINE...
http://www.azntv.com/mp/?source=google

Monday, January 08, 2007

TERRITORY


TERRITORY is an independent film from Writer, Director and Producer Lawrence Levine.

Ben (John B. Good) and Maya (Amanda Gruss) appear to have everything-they are young, attractive, and upwardly mobile. But when they return to their Manhattan apartment from a party late one Saturday night, their seemingly content relationship shows subtle signs of strain; Maya is tipsy and belligerent, Ben disengaged.

When Maya chides Ben for taking up smoking again, Ben seems ready to strangle her, but Maya quickly rescinds, joining Ben for a smoke and the couple settles into a perfectly routine evening of domestic self-indulgence.

The status quo, however, comes to an abrupt halt, when an invader wearing a gasmask bursts through the door, violently wrestling Ben to the floor. The toxic intruder is not a burglar, as the couple initially assumes, but their estranged friend and one-time third wheel, James (Grant James Vargas), who cranks up the music, slam dances to hardcore, exposes old wounds, and uncovers the seething rage beneath the couple's urbanely complacent facade with remarkable precision.

When the dust settles, a devastating portrait of lust, longing, and unrequited love emerges, as the characters face down the approach of middle age by taking stock of their adult lives and confronting the failure of their youthful ideals.

SEE the TRAILER...
http://www.garbledheritage.com/trailer.html
all content copyright garbled heritage productions 2006© all rights reserved

Your film seen in 30 million homes

Cash. Fame. Creative freedom.

MAKE A VIDEO. MAKE AN AD.

Current is about what's going on: stories from the real world, told by you, the filmmaker. Current is a national cable and satellite channel dedicated to bringing your voice to television.

Current slices their schedule into short segments that we call "pods" — each just a few minutes long. You'll see profiles of interesting people on the rise, intelligence on trends as they spring up around us, and international news from new perspectives.

And much of it comes straight from you.

Current calls it viewer-created content, or VC2. Right now, VC2 makes up about a third of our channel — and that share is growing.

It works like this:

Anyone who wants to contribute can upload a video. Then, everyone in the Current online community votes for what should be on TV. You can join in at either stage — watch & vote or make video. (We've also got online training to help you get the skills you need to make TV!)

This is definitely not a traditional TV network. Watching Current, you'll see more, on more topics, from more points of view.

But if we're going to succeed, we need you to do more than watch; we need you to jump in and participate.

LEARN MORE...
http://www.current.tv/make

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Strange Things Happen at Sundown

The narrator of this independent tale of mischeif and mayhem is played by the lovely and talented Masha Sapron. A year ago, she was a mild mannered housewife. After being attacked by vampires and spending three days writhing in her own blood and bile, she was transformed into a renegade, psychotic huntress.

Strange Things Happen at Sundown is the story of vampires run amuck in New York City.

There's a group of low level mobsters with fangs, there's an age-old vampire who does mob hits for money, there's a pair of vampire lovers on the run.

Throw in a born again Christian trying to bring one of the vampires over to her side, an Italian girl from Brooklyn bitten by vampires and left to endure an agonizing three-day turn and a psychotic four-hundred year old blood-sucking housewife with a fetish for cleanliness and virgin girls.

All of them are being hunted by a nefarious vinyl clad woman whose intentions are mysterious and powers are unmatched.

LEARN MORE...and TWO trailers to choose from
http://www.insane-o-rama.com/strangethings.html

Saturday, January 06, 2007

BUYING SCREENPLAYS THIS MONTH:

$100,000-$300,000:
"MULTIPLE MARY", a COMEDY spec by writer SCOT ARMSTRONG nets him low-six figures from NEW LINE CINEMA.

Writer GIDEON YAGO sells his DRAMA spec screenplay "UNDERDOG" to FOCUS FEATURES for low six figures.

CONTRAFILM pays low-six figures to writer ROB MCKITTRICK for his untitled spec COMEDY screenplay.

Low-six figures is paid by IMPACT PICTURES for the spec script "THE AKULA JOB" to its writer MARK DISTEFANO.

$400,000-$600,000:
Writers MIKE ARNOLD and CHRIS POOLE get mid-six figures from FOX ATOMIC for their COMEDY spec script "CAPTAIN AWESOME".

LIONSGATE FILMS pays mid-six figures to JIM KEHOE and BRIAN KEHOE for "THE ESCAPED ARTIST", their COMEDY spec script.

THRILLER spec "THE LAST BEAT" snags writer HARBOR PEOPLES mid-six figures from ARCLIGHT FILMS.

$700,000-$900,000
"SNITCH", a DRAMA spec script, sees NEW LINE CINEMA pay out high-six figures to writer JUSTIN HAYTHE.

Writer LARRY DOYLE cashes in for high-six figures from WALT DISNEY PICTURES for his COMEDY spec screenplay "ME2".

DREAMWORKS pays out high-six figures for the FAMILY spec script, "CAMP CREEPY TIME" to writer DANN GERSHON.

$1 Million or more:
Writers DAN GREANEY and JEFF POLIQUIN score seven figures from UNIVERSAL PICTURES for their COMEDY spec screenplay "SHY GUY".

Reported by writersnet.org

Thursday, January 04, 2007

COOKING WITH ANGRY BOB


With all the cooking shows already on TV, it was bound to happen...

Some comedian was sure to create a cute idea that was scripted just for fun and run with it. That person was Angry Bob and here is his ANGRY BOBesque cooking show - enjoy!

"This collection (ANGRY BOB STUFFED) of live clips was culled from various gigs around NYC...I've heard a lot of underground NYC comics lately, and Bob is definitely one of the funniest" - Sleazegrinder Magazine

I dig comics with an agenda, or a point of view, or at least a good hook. There’s nothin’ worse than listening to some generic shlub up there, tossing off one tired, unrelated joke after another. I like comics when they’re “that guy”. That weird guy, or that creepy guy, or that loud guy, or even that scary guy.

Angry Bob is a ‘that guy’ comic. He is not, however, “that angry guy”. He’s having a little too much fun up there for that. No, Angry Bob is that fat guy. I’m guessing he’s tipping the scales at 350 pounds, somewhere around there. He’s a mountain of man, and there’s just no, ahem, getting around it.

And therein lies his humor. It ain’t easy being him. Girls don’t like him so much. “I can give you something other guys can’t. Like a punctured lung.” He's got other axes to grind, of course, from Madonna to the homeless to the joys and horrors of masturbation, but it’s all delivered with the gravelly voice and the surprisingly eloquent tongue of a guy that, literally, cannot fit in with the rest of the chumps. At least not without a little grease and a shoehorn.

"Angry Bob lifted both arms high and flicked all 10 thick fingers wide toward the ceiling. He walked off the stage to thunderous applause." - The New York Observer

SEE THE PILOT SHOW!
http://www.angrybob.org/cook.html

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

LAST RITES OF THE DEAD

The opening shots in Marc Fratto's LAST RITES OF THE DEAD are reminiscent of those from George Romero's DAWN OF THE DEAD, which at this point are to be expected from any zombie film worth its salt. Quick cuts of interview footage flash on the screen, sound bites to establish set up.

There's an unnerving chord underscoring the scene adding just the right amount of unease. From there the DAWN comparison end. Once the credits roll, and we meet Angela and Josh, the movie becomes its own being.

Everything we need to know about Josh and Angela we learn in two shots. She's cowering in her bathtub. He's pounding on the bathroom door, holding a gun, trying to get in. It's a scene we see too many times on the nightly news, and if it makes the news we already know that outcome.

Domestic violence is as common a plague in real life as the zombie plague is in the movies. Fratto knows this all to well, his day job finds him working at a news station in New York.

INSANE-RAMA PRODUCTIONS is currently in production of a zombie epic, titled "Last Rites of the Dead".

The "Last Rites of the Dead" site is in progress, but I have managed to get some behind the scenes photos to share with the world. Check them out!

The new and improved trailer, now actually playing!
it's about 67.4 MB and runs about a little over two minutes. Enjoy!

TO THE TRAILER...
http://www.insane-o-rama.com/lrtrailer.html

HOLLA


Actress Monica St. John (star of the popular sit-com BABY GURL), her boyfriend Dwayne and six other close friends head for a weekend escape at a remote cabin in the mountains. Along the way, they pick up Dwayne's ex-con cousin Troy.

Monica's agent arrives uninvited with his date, hoping to convince Monica to renew her contract. A severe thunderstorm moves in. While there, a news story seems to implicate Troy in a brutal murder. Just as Dwayne professes Troy's innocence, the lights go out and folk start dying.

Is it Troy the convict, Greg the agent, Dwayne the boyfriend, or one of the "hater" friends? No one knows who's next.

SEE THE TRAILER...
http://www.hollathemovie.com/trailer.htm

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

WHAT IF THEY RELEASED A MOVIE AND NOBODY CAME?

Somewhere out there – possibly reading this very article – are the members of a most exclusive fraternity. These people (I think there may be three of them) may not know each other. They may not know they belong to such a tiny club. But they played a pivotal role in movie history: these people helped the Tom Sizemore and Katherine Heigl-starring movie Zyzzyx Road reach an astonishing 30 dollars at the domestic box office.

That’s not a typo. I didn’t mean 30 million dollars. Or 300,000 dollars. Zyzzyx Road, released on February 25th of 2006, was released in one theater, where it played for six days and earned 30 dollars total. That would be an average of five dollars per day, although Box Office Mojo tells us that the film actually made the bulk of its money – twenty bucks – on the opening weekend.

In the next few days I hope to get more facts about Zyzzyx Road’s seemingly unprecedented theatrical release, including where the film played. My gut instinct tells me that it was at a theater in Los Angeles [UPDATE! Part of the mystery has been solved: Zyzzyx Road opened at the Highland Village Park Theater in Dallas, Texas! Thanks to Ed Douglas for the information], where it had to play briefly to meet contractual obligations. If it did play in Los Angeles, that 30 dollar total probably means three people saw the film over the course of its run – not counting theater employees with morbid curiosities. Who were those three paying customers? Who were the people who saw “Zyzzyx Road” on a theater marquee and just had to pay ten bucks to see it?

Zyzzyx Road is the latest film from Leo Grillo Productions, a company set up by actor Leo Grillo to give him movies in which he can star. In Zyzzyx Road, Leo plays Grant, who is having an affair with Katherine Heigl’s Marissa – yes, Leo Grillo cast himself in a movie where he gets to fuck the Grey’s Anatomy star. Her boyfriend, played by Tom Sizemore, finds out and Grant is forced to kill him. Yes, Leo Grillo cast himself in a movie where he gets to kill Sizemore, a man who is obviously completely indestructible in real life (how else do you explain his continued survival after years of astonishing drug and sexual abuse?).

READ MORE...By Devin Faraci
http://www.chud.com/index.php?type=news&id=8378
Cinematic Happenings Under Development

Top 10 Bloopers-Usability in the Movies

Summary:
User interfaces in film are more exciting than they are realistic, and heroes have far too easy a time using foreign systems.
The way Hollywood depicts usability could fill many a blooper reel. Here are 10 of the most egregious mistakes made by moviemakers.

1. The Hero Can Immediately Use Any UI
Break into a company -- possibly in a foreign country or on an alien planet -- and step up to the computer. How long does it take you to figure out the UI and use the new applications for the first time? Less than a minute if you're a movie star.
The fact that all user interfaces are walk-up-and-use is probably the single most unrealistic aspect of how movies depict computers. In reality, we know all too well that even the smartest users have plenty of problems using even the best designs, let alone the degraded usability typically found in in-house MIS systems or industrial control rooms.

2. Time Travelers Can Use Current Designs
An even worse flaw is the assumption that time travelers from the past could use today's computer systems. In fact, they'd have no conception of any of modern technology's basic concepts, and so would be dramatically more stumped than the novice users we observe in user testing. Even someone who's never used Excel at least understands the general idea of computers and screens.
You might think that people coming from the future would have an easier time using our current systems, given their supposedly superior knowledge. Not true. Like our travelers from the past, they'd lack the conceptual model needed to make sense of the display options. For example, someone who's never seen a command line or typed a command would have a much harder time using DOS than someone who grew up in the DOS era.

If you were transported back in time to the Napoleonic wars and made captain of a British frigate, you'd have no clue how to sail the ship: You couldn't use a sextant and you wouldn't know the names of the different sails, so you couldn't order the sailors to rig the masts appropriately. However, even our sailing case would be easier than someone from the year 2207 having to operate a current computer: sailing ships are still around, and you likely know some of the basic concepts from watching pirate movies. In contrast, it's highly unlikely that anyone from 2207 would have ever seen Windows Vista screens.

3. The 3D UI
In Minority Report, the characters operate a complex information space by gesturing wildly in the space in front of their screens. As Tog found when filming Starfire, it's very tiring to keep your arms in the air while using a computer. Gestures do have their place, but not as the primary user interface for office systems.

5. Access Denied / Access Granted
Countless scenes involve unauthorized access to some system. Invariably, several passwords are tried, resulting in a giant "Access Denied" dialog box. Finally, a few seconds before disaster strikes, the hero enters the correct password and is greeted by an equally huge "Access Granted" dialog box.
A better user interface would proceed directly to the application's home screen as soon as the user has correctly logged in. After all, you design for authorized users. There's no reason to delay them with a special confirmation that yes, they did indeed enter their own passwords correctly.

6. Big Fonts
In addition to the immense font used for "Access Denied" messages, most computer screens in the movies feature big, easily readable text. In real life, users often suffer under tiny text and websites that add insult to injury by not letting users resize the words.
Large text is an obvious concession to the viewing experience: moviegoers must be able to see what's on the screen. Still, enlarging the information that much makes for an unrealistic UI.

7. Star Trek's Talking Computer
The voice-operated computer in Star Trek is an even more egregious example of designing an audience interface rather than a user interface. Spoken commands and spoken responses make it easy for the audience to follow the action, but it's a very inefficient way of controlling a complex system.

In predictions about computing's future, voice interaction is a perennial favorite -- it probably even beats 3D, which is the other top contender for most over-hyped UI technology. While voice has its place, it's even less suitable than 3D for most everyday interactions because it's a less data-rich channel and it's harder to specify something in words than to choose it on a graphical display.

READ MORE...from Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/film-ui-bloopers.html